Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37458410›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2023

Is the early identification and referral of suspected head and neck cancers by community pharmacists feasible? A qualitative interview study exploring the views of patients in North East England.

Susan M Bissett, Andrew Sturrock, Marco Carrozzo, Rachel Lish, Debora Howe, Susan Mountain, Michael Nugent, James O'Hara, Adam Todd, Scott Wilkes and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Early cancer diagnosis and community pharmacies: a systematic review.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Susan M BissettSchool of Dental Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1997-3027
Andrew SturrockDepartment of Nursing Midwifery and Health, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Marco CarrozzoSchool of Dental Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Rachel LishDirectorate of Multiprofessional Education, NHS England North East & Yorkshire, Oral Health Improvement, Health Education England-North East North Cumbria, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
Debora HoweNorthern Head and Neck Cancer Charity (NHANCC), Northumberland, UK.
Susan MountainFaculty of Health Sciences, Patient/Public Involvement & Engagement Group, Sunderland University, Sunderland, UK.
Michael NugentDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Sunderland Royal Hospital, Sunderland, UK.
James O'HaraEar, Nose and Throat Department, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Adam ToddSchool of Pharmacy, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Scott WilkesSchool of Medicine, University of Sunderland, Sunderland, UK.
Philip M PreshawSchool of Dentistry, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
Newcastle University · GBUniversity of Sunderland · GBFreeman Hospital · GBHealth Education England · GBMuseums Northumberland · USNorthumbria University · GBSunderland Royal Hospital · GBUniversity of Dundee · GB

Funding

Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHead and neck cancer (HNC) is the eighth most common cancer in the United Kingdom. Survival rates improve when the cancer is diagnosed at an early stage, highlighting a key need to identify at-risk patients. This study aimed to explore opportunistic HNC identification and referral by community pharmacists (CPs) using a symptom-based risk assessment calculator, from the perspective of patients with a diagnosis of HNC.

methodsPurposive sampling was used to recruit patients from the HNC pathway in three large teaching hospitals in Northern England. Qualitative methodology was used to collect data through an iterative series of semistructured telephone interviews. Framework analysis was utilised to identify key themes.

resultsFour main themes were constructed through the analytic process: (1) HNC presentation and seeking help; (2) the role of the CP; (3) public perception of HNC and (4) the role of a symptom-based risk calculator. Participants agreed that CPs could play a role in the identification and referral of suspected HNCs, but there were concerns about access as patients frequently only encounter the medicine counter assistant when they visit the pharmacy. HNC symptoms are frequently attributed to common or minor conditions initially and therefore considered not urgent, leading to delays in seeking help. While there is public promotion for some cancers, there is little known about HNC. Early presentation of HNC can be quite variable, therefore raising awareness would help. The use of a symptom-based risk calculator was considered beneficial if it enabled earlier referral and diagnosis. Participants suggested that it would also be useful if the public were made aware of it and could self-assess their symptoms.

conclusionIn principle, CPs could play a role in the identification and referral of HNC, but there was uncertainty as to how the intervention would work. Future research is needed to develop an intervention that would facilitate earlier identification and referral of HNC while not disrupting CP work and that would promote HNC and the risk calculator more widely. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) was integrated throughout the project. Initially, the proposal was discussed during a Cancer Head and Neck Group Experience (CHANGE) PPIE meeting. CHANGE was set up to support HNC research in 2018. The group is composed of seven members (four female, three male) with an age range of 50-71 years, who were diagnosed at Sunderland Royal Hospital. A patient representative from the University of Sunderland PPIE group and a trustee of the Northern HNC Charity were recruited as co-applicants. They attended project management group meetings and reviewed patient-facing documentation.

Indexed as

Head and Neck NeoplasmsPharmacistsAgedEnglandFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchReferral and Consultationcommunity pharmacyearly identificationhead and neck cancerpharmacistsqualitativereferralscreening

Identifiers

PMID37458410
PMCPMC10485314
OpenAlexW4384523423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.