Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37458340›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurosurgery. Case lessons2023

Robot-assisted screw fixation in a cadaver utilizing magnetic resonance imaging-based synthetic computed tomography: toward radiation-free spine surgery. Illustrative case.

A Daniel Davidar, Brendan F Judy, Andrew M Hersh, Carly Weber-Levine, Safwan Alomari, Arjun K Menta, Kelly Jiang, Meghana Bhimreddy, Mir Hussain, Neil R Crawford and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Feasibility of synthetic CT images for robotic pedicle screw planning and navigation.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

A Daniel DavidarDepartments of1Neurosurgery and.
Brendan F JudyDepartments of1Neurosurgery and.
Andrew M HershDepartments of1Neurosurgery and.
Carly Weber-LevineDepartments of1Neurosurgery and.
Safwan AlomariDepartments of1Neurosurgery and.
Arjun K MentaDepartments of1Neurosurgery and.
Kelly JiangDepartments of1Neurosurgery and.
Meghana BhimreddyDepartments of1Neurosurgery and.
Mir Hussain2Globus Medical, Inc, Audubon, Pennsylvania.
Neil R Crawford2Globus Medical, Inc, Audubon, Pennsylvania.
Majid Khan3Radiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; and.
Gary Gong3Radiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; and.
Nicholas TheodoreDepartments of1Neurosurgery and.
Johns Hopkins University · USJohns Hopkins Medicine · USGlobus Medical (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSynthetic computed tomography (sCT) can be created from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) utilizing newer software. sCT is yet to be explored as a possible alternative to routine CT (rCT). In this study, rCT scans and MRI-derived sCT scans were obtained on a cadaver. Morphometric analysis was performed comparing the 2 scans. The ExcelsiusGPS robot was used to place lumbosacral screws with both rCT and sCT images. OBSERVATIONS: In total, 14 screws were placed. All screws were grade A on the Gertzbein-Robbins scale. The mean surface distance difference between rCT and sCT on a reconstructed software model was -0.02 ± 0.05 mm, the mean absolute surface distance was 0.24 ± 0.05 mm, and the mean absolute error of radiodensity was 92.88 ± 10.53 HU. The overall mean tip distance for the sCT versus rCT was 1.74 ± 1.1 versus 2.36 ± 1.6 mm (p = 0.24); mean tail distance for the sCT versus rCT was 1.93 ± 0.88 versus 2.81 ± 1.03 mm (p = 0.07); and mean angular deviation for the sCT versus rCT was 3.2° ± 2.05° versus 4.04°± 2.71° (p = 0.53). LESSONS: MRI-based sCT yielded results comparable to those of rCT in both morphometric analysis and robot-assisted lumbosacral screw placement in a cadaver study.

Indexed as

bone MRIconvolutional neural networklumbarroboticsscrew fixationsynthetic CT

Identifiers

PMID37458340
PMCPMC10555644
OpenAlexW4383956556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.