ArticleMedical physics2024
Dosimetric characterization of a rotating anode x-ray tube for FLASH radiotherapy research.
Article in Medical physics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- The evolution of FLASH radiotherapy: a bibliometric analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Dosimetric Characterization and Workflow Optimization of the FLASH-SARRP for Reliable Preclinical Radiobiological Studies.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- A Feasibility Study of Preclinical Ocular X-Ray FLASH Radiation Therapy.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2025Article
- Comprehensive characterization and validation of a fast-resolving (1000 Hz) plastic scintillator for ultra-high dose rate electron dosimetry.Medical physics · 2025Article
- Effect of Ultrahigh Dose Rate on Biomolecular Radiation Damage.Radiation research · 2024Article
- FLASH Radiotherapy: Benefits, Mechanisms, and Obstacles to Its Clinical Application.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Review
- FLASH Radiotherapy: What Can FLASH's Ultra High Dose Rate Offer to the Treatment of Patients With Sarcoma?Seminars in radiation oncology · 2024Review
- Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Bragg Peak Conformal FLASH in Prostate Cancer Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy.Cancers · 2024Article
- FLASH Effects Induced by Orthovoltage X-Rays.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeMost current research toward ultra-high dose rate (FLASH) radiation is conducted with advanced proton and electron accelerators, which are of limited accessibility to basic laboratory research. An economical alternative to charged particle accelerators is to employ high-capacity rotating anode x-ray tubes to produce kilovoltage x-rays at FLASH dose rates at short source-to-surface distances (SSD). This work describes a comprehensive dosimetric evaluation of a rotating anode x-ray tube for potential application in laboratory FLASH study. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A commercially available high-capacity fluoroscopy x-ray tube with 75 kW input power was implemented as a potential FLASH irradiator. Radiochromic EBT3 film and thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) were used to investigate the effects of SSD and field size on dose rates and depth-dose characteristics in kV-compatible solid water phantoms. Custom 3D printed accessories were developed to enable reproducible phantom setup at very short SSD. Open and collimated radiation fields were assessed.
resultsDespite the lower x-ray energy and short SSD used, FLASH dose rates above 40 Gy/s were achieved for targets up to 10-mm depth in solid water. Maximum surface dose rates of 96 Gy/s were measured in the open field at 47 mm SSD. A non-uniform high-to-low dose gradient was observed in the planar dose distribution, characteristic of anode heel effects. With added collimation, beams up to 10-mm diameter with reasonable uniformity can be produced. Typical 80%-20% penumbra in the collimated x-ray FLASH beams were less than 1 mm at 5-mm depth in phantom. Ramp-up times at the maximum input current were less than 1 ms.
conclusionOur dosimetric characterization demonstrates that rotating anode x-ray tube technology is capable of producing radiation beams in support of preclinical FLASH radiobiology research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.