Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37458033›Full record

ArticleJournal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD2023

Mnemonic Discrimination Performance in a Memory Clinic: A Pilot Study.

Ghislain Belliart-Guérin, Vincent Planche

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Cognitive modeling of the Mnemonic Similarity Task as a digital biomarker for Alzheimer's disease.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ghislain Belliart-GuérinCHU de Bordeaux, Pôle de Neurosciences Cliniques, Centre Mémoire de Ressources et de Recherche, Bordeaux, France.
Vincent PlancheCHU de Bordeaux, Pôle de Neurosciences Cliniques, Centre Mémoire de Ressources et de Recherche, Bordeaux, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMnemonic discrimination is the behavioral ability stemming from pattern separation, which is the neural process of establishing independent and non-overlapping new memories. Over the past two decades, its assessment in various populations has contributed to a better conceptual understanding of age-related memory decline.

objectiveTo assess the clinical relevance of mnemonic discrimination in the memory clinics setting.

methodsThis retrospective study was performed in 90 patients with a Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)>18 who consulted our memory clinic for the first time. All patients were tested with the Mnemonic Similarity Task, a freely available computerized test. Global cognitive function, executive function, visuoconstructional abilities, and verbal and visual episodic memory were also collected, together with the diagnosis after the initial clinical assessment (subjective cognitive complaint [SCC], mild cognitive impairment [MCI], or mild dementia).

resultsMnemonic discrimination performance was correlated with global cognitive function, executive function, and visual and verbal episodic memory scores, independent of age. It discriminated patients with SCC from those with MCI (amnestic or non-amnestic) with moderate accuracy (AUC = 0.77-0.78), similar to MMSE and the Frontal Assessment Battery (AUC = 0.74-0.84). Mnemonic discrimination performance did not distinguish between amnestic and non-amnestic MCI and the variability of the measure was important within groups.

conclusionMnemonic discrimination performance involves many cognitive domains and discriminates between patients with SCC and MCI with performance equivalent to "paper-and-pencil" screening tests. Further dedicated prospective studies will determine whether this task is of interest beyond research purposes, as a diagnostic or screening tool in primary care.

Indexed as

Cognitive DysfunctionMemory, EpisodicHumansNeuropsychological TestsPilot ProjectsProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesAlzheimer’s diseaseepisodic memoryhippocampusmemory clinicmild cognitive impairmentmnemonic discriminationpattern separationsubjective cognitive complaint

Identifiers

PMID37458033
PMCPMC10473128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.