ArticleJournal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD2023
Mnemonic Discrimination Performance in a Memory Clinic: A Pilot Study.
Article in Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Mnemonic Discrimination Performance in Anxiety and Depression: A Systematic Review.Depression and anxiety · 2026Pooled it
- Subjective Memory Impairment in the General Adult Population: Associations With Early-Life Cognition, Concurrent Objective Memory, Dementia Risk Factors.European journal of neurology · 2026Article
- MST in the wild: Optimizing the mnemonic similarity task for use in diverse environments.Neuropsychologia · 2026Article
- Misclassification in memory modification ineLife · 2025Article
- Digital cognitive assessments as low-burden markers for predicting future cognitive decline and tau accumulation across the Alzheimer's spectrum.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024Article
- Cognitive modeling of the Mnemonic Similarity Task as a digital biomarker for Alzheimer's disease.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024Article
- Digital cognitive assessments as low-burden markers for predicting future cognitive decline and tau accumulation across the Alzheimer's spectrum.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Cognitive modeling of the Mnemonic Similarity Task as a digital biomarker for Alzheimer's Disease.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Examining the diagnostic value of the mnemonic discrimination task for classification of cognitive status and amyloid-beta burden.Neuropsychologia · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMnemonic discrimination is the behavioral ability stemming from pattern separation, which is the neural process of establishing independent and non-overlapping new memories. Over the past two decades, its assessment in various populations has contributed to a better conceptual understanding of age-related memory decline.
objectiveTo assess the clinical relevance of mnemonic discrimination in the memory clinics setting.
methodsThis retrospective study was performed in 90 patients with a Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)>18 who consulted our memory clinic for the first time. All patients were tested with the Mnemonic Similarity Task, a freely available computerized test. Global cognitive function, executive function, visuoconstructional abilities, and verbal and visual episodic memory were also collected, together with the diagnosis after the initial clinical assessment (subjective cognitive complaint [SCC], mild cognitive impairment [MCI], or mild dementia).
resultsMnemonic discrimination performance was correlated with global cognitive function, executive function, and visual and verbal episodic memory scores, independent of age. It discriminated patients with SCC from those with MCI (amnestic or non-amnestic) with moderate accuracy (AUC = 0.77-0.78), similar to MMSE and the Frontal Assessment Battery (AUC = 0.74-0.84). Mnemonic discrimination performance did not distinguish between amnestic and non-amnestic MCI and the variability of the measure was important within groups.
conclusionMnemonic discrimination performance involves many cognitive domains and discriminates between patients with SCC and MCI with performance equivalent to "paper-and-pencil" screening tests. Further dedicated prospective studies will determine whether this task is of interest beyond research purposes, as a diagnostic or screening tool in primary care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.