Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37457957›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2023

Prevalence of mpox viral DNA in cutaneous specimens of monkeypox-infected patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Isha Rani, Anmol Goyal, Muhammad Aaqib Shamim, Prakasini Satapathy, Amit Pal, Rosanna Squitti, Kalyan Goswami, Ranjit Sah, Joshuan J Barboza, Bijaya K Padhi

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Emergency department approach to monkeypox.World journal of emergency medicine · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Isha RaniDepartment of Biochemistry, Maharishi Markandeshwar College of Medical Sciences and Research (MMCMSR), Sadopur, Ambala, India.
Anmol GoyalDepartment of Community Medicine, Maharishi Markandeshwar College of Medical Sciences and Research (MMCMSR), Sadopur, Ambala, India.
Muhammad Aaqib ShamimDepartment of Pharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.
Prakasini SatapathyDepartment of Virology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Amit PalDepartment of Biochemistry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Kalyani, India.
Rosanna SquittiDepartment of Laboratory Science, Research and Development Division, Fatebenefratelli Isola Tiberina, Gemelli Isola, Rome, Italy.
Kalyan GoswamiDepartment of Biochemistry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Kalyani, India.
Ranjit SahDepartment of Microbiology, Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital, Institute of Medicine, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Joshuan J BarbozaEscuela de Medicina, Universidad Cesar Vallejo, Trujillo, Peru.
Bijaya K PadhiDepartment of Community Medicine and School of Public Health, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
All India Institute of Medical Sciences · INMaharishi Markandeshwar University, Mullana · INPost Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research · INAll India Institute of Medical Sciences Jodhpur · INDr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre · INFatebenefratelli Hospital · ITUniversidad César Vallejo · PE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Human monkeypox (mpox) disease is a multicountry outbreak driven by human-human transmission which has resulted in an international public health emergency. However, there is limited evidence on the positivity rate of skin lesions for mpox viral DNA. We aim to fill this gap by estimating the pooled positivity rate of skin samples with mpox viral DNA from mpox patients globally. Methods: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, seven databases and several preprint servers have been extensively searched until 17 January 2023 according to a prospectively registered protocol (PROSPERO: CRD42023392505). Articles including the positivity rate of skin samples with mpox viral DNA in mpox-confirmed patients were considered eligible. After a quality assessment, a random-effect meta-analysis was used for pooled prevalence. To explore and resolve heterogeneity, we used statistical methods for outlier detection, influence analysis, and sensitivity analysis. Findings: Among the 331 articles retrieved after deduplication, 14 studies were finally included. The pooled positivity rate of the skin samples was 98.77% (95% CI: 94.74%-99.72%). After the removal of an influential outlier, Conclusion/interpretation: The present findings reinforce that skin lesions act as a reservoir of mpox viral DNA and contribute to a high infectivity risk. This may be a prevailing basis of prompt transmission during the current multicountry outbreak and also needs further investigation. The present imperative outcome may benefit in producing valuable preventive and management procedures in an appropriate health strategy.

Indexed as

DNA, ViralMpox, MonkeypoxDatabases, FactualDisease OutbreaksHumansPrevalenceDNA, Viralcutaneousinfectivity potentialmeta-analysismonkeypoxmpox viral DNAskin lesiontransmission

Identifiers

PMID37457957
PMCPMC10349178
OpenAlexW4382812816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.