Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37457943›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of bioprinting2023

Multimaterial and multiscale scaffold for engineering enthesis organ.

Simone Micalizzi, Lara Russo, Chiara Giacomelli, Francesca Montemurro, Carmelo de Maria, Martina Nencioni, Laura Marchetti, Maria Letizia Trincavelli, Giovanni Vozzi

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of bioprinting, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Simone MicalizziResearch Centre E. Piaggio and Department of Information Engineering, University of Pisa, Largo L. Lazzarino 1, 56126 Pisa, Italy.
Lara RussoDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Pisa, Pisa 56127, Italy.
Chiara GiacomelliDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Pisa, Pisa 56127, Italy.
Francesca MontemurroResearch Centre E. Piaggio and Department of Information Engineering, University of Pisa, Largo L. Lazzarino 1, 56126 Pisa, Italy.
Carmelo de MariaResearch Centre E. Piaggio and Department of Information Engineering, University of Pisa, Largo L. Lazzarino 1, 56126 Pisa, Italy.
Martina NencioniDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Pisa, Pisa 56127, Italy.
Laura MarchettiDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Pisa, Pisa 56127, Italy.
Maria Letizia TrincavelliDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Pisa, Pisa 56127, Italy.
Giovanni VozziResearch Centre E. Piaggio and Department of Information Engineering, University of Pisa, Largo L. Lazzarino 1, 56126 Pisa, Italy.
University of Pisa · ITPiaggio (Italy) · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tendon and ligament injuries are relevant clinical problems in modern society, and the current medical approaches do not guarantee complete recovery of the physiological functionalities. Moreover, they present a non-negligible failure rate after surgery. Failures often occur at the enthesis, which is the area of tendons and ligaments insertion to bones. This area is highly anisotropic and composed of four distinct zones: tendon or ligament, non-mineralized fibrocartilage, mineralized fibrocartilage, and bone. The organization of these regions provides a gradient in mechanical properties, biochemical composition, cellular phenotype, and extracellular matrix organization. Tissue engineering represents an alternative to traditional medical approaches. This work presents a novel biofabrication approach for engineering the enthesis. Gradient-based scaffolds were fabricated by exploiting the combination of electrospinning and three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting technologies. Studies were conducted to evaluate scaffold biocompatibility by seeding bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BM-MSCs). Then, the scaffold's ability to promote cellular adhesion, growth, proliferation, and differentiation in both tenogenic and osteogenic phenotypes was evaluated. Fabricated scaffolds were also morphologically and mechanically characterized, showing optimal properties comparable to literature data. The versatility and potentiality of this novel biofabrication approach were demonstrated by fabricating clinical-size 3D enthesis scaffolds. The mechanical characterization highlighted their behavior during a tensile test was comparable to tendons and ligaments

Indexed as

ElectrospinningEnthesisGradient scaffoldHuman mesenchymal stem cellsMultiscale and multimaterial 3D bioprinting

Identifiers

PMID37457943
PMCPMC10339436
OpenAlexW4380088703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.