ArticleInternational journal of bioprinting2023
Multimaterial and multiscale scaffold for engineering enthesis organ.
Article in International journal of bioprinting, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- 3D-printed scaffold-based strategies for enthesis regeneration: a systematic review of the literature.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Pooled it
- Silk cryogel and electrospun scaffold characterization for bone-tendon interface applications.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Advanced engineering strategies for biomaterial scaffolds application in tendon-bone interface regeneration.Burns & trauma · 2026Review
- Hierarchy Reproduction: Multiphasic Strategies for Tendon/Ligament-Bone Junction Repair.Biomaterials research · 2025Review
- 4D Printing Shape-Morphing Hybrid Biomaterials for Advanced Bioengineering Applications.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tendon and ligament injuries are relevant clinical problems in modern society, and the current medical approaches do not guarantee complete recovery of the physiological functionalities. Moreover, they present a non-negligible failure rate after surgery. Failures often occur at the enthesis, which is the area of tendons and ligaments insertion to bones. This area is highly anisotropic and composed of four distinct zones: tendon or ligament, non-mineralized fibrocartilage, mineralized fibrocartilage, and bone. The organization of these regions provides a gradient in mechanical properties, biochemical composition, cellular phenotype, and extracellular matrix organization. Tissue engineering represents an alternative to traditional medical approaches. This work presents a novel biofabrication approach for engineering the enthesis. Gradient-based scaffolds were fabricated by exploiting the combination of electrospinning and three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting technologies. Studies were conducted to evaluate scaffold biocompatibility by seeding bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BM-MSCs). Then, the scaffold's ability to promote cellular adhesion, growth, proliferation, and differentiation in both tenogenic and osteogenic phenotypes was evaluated. Fabricated scaffolds were also morphologically and mechanically characterized, showing optimal properties comparable to literature data. The versatility and potentiality of this novel biofabrication approach were demonstrated by fabricating clinical-size 3D enthesis scaffolds. The mechanical characterization highlighted their behavior during a tensile test was comparable to tendons and ligaments
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.