Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37457930›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of bioprinting2023

Smart implants: 4D-printed shape-morphing scaffolds for medical implantation.

Guiwen Qu, Jinjian Huang, Guosheng Gu, Zongan Li, Xiuwen Wu, Jianan Ren

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of bioprinting, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Acoustic shape-morphing micromachines.Nature communications · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Recent advances in 3D printing applications for CNS tumours.European journal of medical research · 2025
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Guiwen QuResearch Institute of General Surgery, Jinling Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing 210009, China.
Jinjian HuangResearch Institute of General Surgery, Jinling Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing 210009, China.
Guosheng GuResearch Institute of General Surgery, Jinling Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing 210009, China.
Zongan LiJiangsu Key Laboratory of 3D Printing Equipment and Manufacturing, NARI School of Electrical and Automation Engineering, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210042, China.
Xiuwen WuResearch Institute of General Surgery, Jinling Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing 210009, China.
Jianan RenResearch Institute of General Surgery, Jinling Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing 210009, China.
Southeast University · CNNanjing General Hospital of Nanjing Military Command · CNNanjing Normal University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biomedical implants have recently shown excellent application potential in tissue repair and replacement. Applying three-dimensional (3D) printing to implant scaffold fabrication can help to address individual needs more precisely. Fourdimensional (4D) printing emerges rapidly based on the development of shape-responsive materials and design methods, which makes the production of dynamic functional implants possible. Smart implants can be pre-designed to respond to endogenous or exogenous stimuli and perform seamless integration with regular/ irregular tissue defects, defect-luminal organs, or curved structures via programmed shape morphing. At the same time, they offer great advantages in minimally invasive surgery due to the small-to-large volume transition. In addition, 4D-printed cellular scaffolds can generate extracellular matrix (ECM)-mimetic structures that interact with the contacting cells, expanding the possible sources of tissue/organ grafts and substitutes. This review summarizes the typical technologies and materials of 4D-printed scaffolds, and the programming designs and applications of these scaffolds are further highlighted. Finally, we propose the prospects and outlook of 4D-printed shape-morphing implants.

Indexed as

4D printingMedical implantsMinimally invasive surgeryShape-morphing scaffoldsTissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID37457930
PMCPMC10339452
OpenAlexW4380087404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.