ArticleFood technology and biotechnology2023
Investigation of SARS-CoV-2 Detection Method Applicability and Virus Occurrence in Food and Food Packaging.
Article in Food technology and biotechnology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Research background: While it is clear that SARS CoV-2 coronavirus is the primary respiratory virus, there are no entirely clarified ways of transmission. Foodborne transmission has remained an unexplained path. Therefore, the goals of this paper are to examine and present an assessment of the most appropriate of the four selected kits for RNA extraction for the testing and detection of SARS-CoV-2 on food packaging surfaces, food surfaces, and in food. This will enable to indicate the possibility of infection through contact or direct food consumption. Experimental approach: Finding the best technique is vital as RNA extraction is one of the essential elements in detecting SARS-CoV-2. This was achieved through an experiment with four commercial kits following the original manufacturers' protocols, and with a modification of the original protocols that included the use of ethanol and isopropanol. The selected kit was used for RNA extraction from the swabs of packaging surfaces, food surface, and ready-to-eat food samples. The coronavirus was then identified using real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assays to determine whether the SARS-CoV-2 virus or viral particles are present in the food chain with the overall purpose of demonstrating the possibility that food can contribute as a vehicle for the transmission of the virus. Results and conclusions: The findings of this investigation made the most effective extraction kit and protocol stand out. The results of the applicability of the kit indicated a significant share of positive samples of viral SARS-CoV-2 virus particles on surfaces from the environment where infected persons with 'silent' COVID-19 infection, with mild symptoms or no symptoms, were present. However, according to the findings of the second part of the study, the virus was not detected on the examined samples of food packaging surfaces, food surfaces, and food. Novelty and scientific contribution: The presented results distinguished one of the most suitable protocols for isolating RNA from environmental surface samples. The main contribution of the study is in the presentation of the results, that is, the examination of samples that are primarily related to the food chain, food packaging, food surfaces, and ready-to-eat food. The results of this study could also be helpful for further determination of the potential of food as a vector for the transmission of coronaviruses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.