Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37457875›Full record

ArticleJBMR plus2023

Risk of Fracture After Bilateral Oophorectomy.

Trine K Hueg, Martha Hickey, Astrid L Beck, Louise F Wilson, Cecilie S Uldbjerg, Lærke Priskorn, Julie Abildgaard, Youn-Hee Lim, Elvira V Bräuner

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JBMR plus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Trine K HuegDepartment of Growth and Reproduction Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet Copenhagen Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0424-7268
Martha HickeyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology University of Melbourne Melbourne Australia.
Astrid L BeckDepartment of Growth and Reproduction Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet Copenhagen Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3366-9723
Louise F WilsonNHMRC Centre for Research Excellence on Women and Non-communicable Diseases (CREWaND), School of Public Health The University of Queensland Herston Australia.
Cecilie S UldbjergDepartment of Growth and Reproduction Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet Copenhagen Denmark.
Lærke PriskornDepartment of Growth and Reproduction Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet Copenhagen Denmark.
Julie AbildgaardCentre for Physical Activity Research Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark.
Youn-Hee LimSection of Environmental Health, Department of Public Health University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark.
Elvira V BräunerDepartment of Growth and Reproduction Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet Copenhagen Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9183-4796
Copenhagen University Hospital · DKUniversity of Copenhagen · DKThe University of Melbourne · AUThe University of Queensland · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fragility fractures, resulting from low-energy trauma, occur in approximately 1 in 10 Danish women aged 50 years or older. Bilateral oophorectomy (surgical removal of both ovaries) may increase the risk of fragility fractures due to loss of ovarian sex steroids, particularly estrogen. We investigated the association between bilateral oophorectomy and risk of fragility fracture and whether this was conditional on age at time of bilateral oophorectomy, hormone therapy (HT) use, hysterectomy, physical activity level, body mass index (BMI), or smoking. We performed a cohort study of 25,853 female nurses (≥45 years) participating in the Danish Nurse Cohort. Nurses were followed from age 50 years or entry into the cohort, whichever came last, until date of first fragility fracture, death, emigration, or end of follow-up on December 31, 2018, whichever came first. Cox regression models with age as the underlying time scale were used to estimate the association between time-varying bilateral oophorectomy (all ages, <51/≥51 years) and incident fragility fracture (any and site-specific [forearm, hip, spine, and other]). Exposure and outcome were ascertained from nationwide patient registries. During 491,626 person-years of follow-up, 6600 nurses (25.5%) with incident fragility fractures were identified, and 1938 (7.5%) nurses had a bilateral oophorectomy. The frequency of fragility fractures was 24.1% in nurses who were <51 years at time of bilateral oophorectomy and 18.1% in nurses who were ≥51 years. No statistically significant associations were observed between bilateral oophorectomy at any age and fragility fractures at any site. Neither HT use, hysterectomy, physical activity level, BMI, nor smoking altered the results. © 2023 The Authors.

Indexed as

EPIDEMIOLOGYFRACTURE RISK ASSESSMENTGENERAL POPULATION STUDIESHORMONE REPLACEMENTMENOPAUSE

Identifiers

PMID37457875
PMCPMC10339092
OpenAlexW4367679235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.