Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37457742›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2023

Immunogenic landscape and risk score prediction based on unfolded protein response (UPR)-related molecular subtypes in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Hanyao Guo, Sidi Zhang, Bo Zhang, Yanan Shang, Xiaoyu Liu, Meixia Wang, Hongyu Wang, Yumei Fan, Ke Tan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hanyao GuoMinistry of Education Key Laboratory of Molecular and Cellular Biology; Hebei Research Center of the Basic Discipline of Cell Biology, Hebei Province Key Laboratory of Animal Physiology, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, College of Life Sciences, Hebei Normal University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Sidi ZhangMinistry of Education Key Laboratory of Molecular and Cellular Biology; Hebei Research Center of the Basic Discipline of Cell Biology, Hebei Province Key Laboratory of Animal Physiology, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, College of Life Sciences, Hebei Normal University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Bo ZhangMinistry of Education Key Laboratory of Molecular and Cellular Biology; Hebei Research Center of the Basic Discipline of Cell Biology, Hebei Province Key Laboratory of Animal Physiology, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, College of Life Sciences, Hebei Normal University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Yanan ShangMinistry of Education Key Laboratory of Molecular and Cellular Biology; Hebei Research Center of the Basic Discipline of Cell Biology, Hebei Province Key Laboratory of Animal Physiology, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, College of Life Sciences, Hebei Normal University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Xiaoyu LiuMinistry of Education Key Laboratory of Molecular and Cellular Biology; Hebei Research Center of the Basic Discipline of Cell Biology, Hebei Province Key Laboratory of Animal Physiology, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, College of Life Sciences, Hebei Normal University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Meixia WangMinistry of Education Key Laboratory of Molecular and Cellular Biology; Hebei Research Center of the Basic Discipline of Cell Biology, Hebei Province Key Laboratory of Animal Physiology, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, College of Life Sciences, Hebei Normal University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Hongyu WangMinistry of Education Key Laboratory of Molecular and Cellular Biology; Hebei Research Center of the Basic Discipline of Cell Biology, Hebei Province Key Laboratory of Animal Physiology, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, College of Life Sciences, Hebei Normal University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Yumei FanMinistry of Education Key Laboratory of Molecular and Cellular Biology; Hebei Research Center of the Basic Discipline of Cell Biology, Hebei Province Key Laboratory of Animal Physiology, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, College of Life Sciences, Hebei Normal University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Ke TanMinistry of Education Key Laboratory of Molecular and Cellular Biology; Hebei Research Center of the Basic Discipline of Cell Biology, Hebei Province Key Laboratory of Animal Physiology, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, College of Life Sciences, Hebei Normal University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Hebei Normal University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common type of cancer and causes a significant number of cancer-related deaths worldwide. The molecular mechanisms underlying the development of HCC are complex, and the heterogeneity of HCC has led to a lack of effective prognostic indicators and drug targets for clinical treatment of HCC. Previous studies have indicated that the unfolded protein response (UPR), a fundamental pathway for maintaining endoplasmic reticulum homeostasis, is involved in the formation of malignant characteristics such as tumor cell invasiveness and treatment resistance. The aims of our study are to identify new prognostic indicators and provide drug treatment targets for HCC in clinical treatment based on UPR-related genes (URGs). Methods: Gene expression profiles and clinical information were downloaded from the TCGA, ICGC and GEO databases. Consensus cluster analysis was performed to classify the molecular subtypes of URGs in HCC patients. Univariate Cox regression and machine learning LASSO algorithm were used to establish a risk prognosis model. Kaplan-Meier and ROC analyses were used to evaluate the clinical prognosis of URGs. TIMER and XCell algorithms were applied to analyze the relationships between URGs and immune cell infiltration. Real time-PCR was performed to analyze the effect of sorafenib on the expression levels of four URGs. Results: Most URGs were upregulated in HCC samples. According to the expression pattern of URGs, HCC patients were divided into two independent clusters. Cluster 1 had a higher expression level, worse prognosis, and higher expression of immunosuppressive factors than cluster 2. Patients in cluster 1 were more prone to immune escape during immunotherapy, and were more sensitive to chemotherapeutic drugs. Four key UPR genes (ATF4, GOSR2, PDIA6 and SRPRB) were established in the prognostic model and HCC patients with high risk score had a worse clinical prognosis. Additionally, patients with high expression of four URGs are more sensitive to sorafenib. Moreover, ATF4 was upregulated, while GOSR2, PDIA6 and SRPRB were downregulated in sorafenib-treated HCC cells. Conclusion: The UPR-related prognostic signature containing four URGs exhibits high potential application value and performs well in the evaluation of effects of chemotherapy/immunotherapy and clinical prognosis.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularLiver NeoplasmsHumansImmunotherapyQb-SNARE ProteinsRisk FactorsSorafenibGOSR2 protein, humanQb-SNARE ProteinsSorafenibdrug sensitivityhepatocellular carcinomaimmune microenvironmentmolecular subtypesunfolded protein response (UPR)

Identifiers

PMID37457742
PMCPMC10348016
OpenAlexW4382862344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.