SynthesisFrontiers in immunology2023
Prognostic models for predicting postoperative recurrence in Crohn's disease: a systematic review and critical appraisal.
Synthesis in Frontiers in immunology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Risk Factors and Predictive Biomarkers for Postoperative Complications in Crohn's Disease Surgery: Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Pooled it
- Biologic Therapy and Surgical Management in Crohn's Disease: Postoperative Outcomes and Biologic Management Patterns in a Retrospective Cohort Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Distribution of gut microbiota across intestinal segments and their impact on human physiological and pathological processes.Cell & bioscience · 2025Review
- Gut microbiota and mesenteric adipose tissue interactions in shaping phenotypes and treatment strategies for Crohn's disease.World journal of gastroenterology · 2024Article
- Management of Post-Operative Crohn's Disease: Knowns and Unknowns.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Prophylaxis of postoperative recurrence is an intractable problem for clinicians and patients with Crohn's disease. Prognostic models are effective tools for patient stratification and personalised management. This systematic review aimed to provide an overview and critically appraise the existing models for predicting postoperative recurrence of Crohn's disease. Methods: Systematic retrieval was performed using PubMed and Web of Science in January 2022. Original articles on prognostic models for predicting postoperative recurrence of Crohn's disease were included in the analysis. The risk of bias was assessed using the Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment (PROBAST) tool. This study was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO; number CRD42022311737). Results: In total, 1948 articles were screened, of which 15 were ultimately considered. Twelve studies developed 15 new prognostic models for Crohn's disease and the other three validated the performance of three existing models. Seven models utilised regression algorithms, six utilised scoring indices, and five utilised machine learning. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the models ranged from 0.51 to 0.97. Six models showed good discrimination, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of >0.80. All models were determined to have a high risk of bias in modelling or analysis, while they were at low risk of applicability concerns. Conclusions: Prognostic models have great potential for facilitating the assessment of postoperative recurrence risk in patients with Crohn's disease. Existing prognostic models require further validation regarding their reliability and applicability. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42022311737.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.