Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37457729›Full record

Trial reportFrontiers in immunology2023

Dose-escalating ruxolitinib for refractory hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis.

Yue Song, Xiaoli Li, Xuefeng He, Fei Zhou, Feng Du, Ziyan Wang, Suning Chen, Depei Wu

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Frontiers in immunology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. [Mechanism and clinical progress of JAK inhibitors in hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis].Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yue SongNational Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Diseases, Jiangsu Institute of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Xiaoli LiDepartment of Hematology, Soochow Hopes Hematonosis Hospital, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Xuefeng HeNational Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Diseases, Jiangsu Institute of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Fei ZhouNational Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Diseases, Jiangsu Institute of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Feng DuDepartment of Hematology, Soochow Hopes Hematonosis Hospital, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Ziyan WangDepartment of Hematology, Soochow Hopes Hematonosis Hospital, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Suning ChenNational Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Diseases, Jiangsu Institute of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Depei WuNational Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Diseases, Jiangsu Institute of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Soochow University · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is a severe disorder characterized by excessive secretion of cytokines. Even with the recommended HLH-94/2004 regimen, over 30% of patients remain refractory to frontline therapy or relapse after an initial response, leading to poor clinical outcomes. Ruxolitinib, a JAK1/2 inhibitor targets key cytokines in HLH, has shown promising therapeutic effects. However, there has been little attention given to patients who do not respond to ruxolitinib and whether an escalating dose can provide a resolution. Methods: This study analyzed eight HLH patients who received dose-escalating ruxolitinib who had previously failed to respond to the general dose. The efficacy and safety were mainly analyzed. Results: Overall, four out of eight (50%) patients achieved better remission after dose escalation. Two patients who only showed improvement with the general dose achieved complete remission (CR) after dose escalation, and the other two patients also achieved CR after dose escalation when they did not respond to the general dose. The median time to achieve the best overall response was 18.5 days (IQR 13.25-23.75 days). There was no correlation of treatment outcome with blood count, liver function, LDH, cytokines, ferritin levels, NK cell activity, or the time to initiation of ruxolitinib and maximum dosage. The etiology of HLH (p=0.029) and level of sCD25 (p=0.021) correlated with treatment response to dose-escalating ruxolitinib. The area of sCD25 under the ROC curve was 0.8125 (95% CI 0.5921 to 1.033, p=0.035) when using 10,000 pg/ml as the cut-off value for predicting therapeutic effects. After a median follow-up of 159 days, two patients died, and the estimated 2-month overall survival rate was 75%. Adverse effects possibly related to the dose-escalating of ruxolitinib included two cases of extremity pain and one of aminotransferase increased. No grade 3 or higher adverse events were reported. Conclusion: This is the first comprehensive study on the use of dose-escalating ruxolitinib in HLH. Ruxolitinib at an escalated dose represent a viable and relatively safe solution for managing refractory HLH. The levels of sCD25 (with a cut-off of 10000pg/ml) can serve as an indicator for early consideration of chemotherapy during treatment.

Indexed as

Lymphohistiocytosis, HemophagocyticCytokinesHumansNitrilesPyrazolesPyrimidinesCytokinesNitrilesPyrazolesPyrimidinesruxolitinibcytokinesdose-escalatinghemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosisJAK1/2 inhibitorruxolitinibsalvage therapystratification

Identifiers

PMID37457729
PMCPMC10339381
OpenAlexW4382723074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.