Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37457405›Full record

ReviewFood science and biotechnology2023

Biopreservative technologies of food: an alternative to chemical preservation and recent developments.

Kirupa Sankar Muthuvelu, Baranitharan Ethiraj, Shreyasi Pramnik, N Keerthish Raj, Swethaa Venkataraman, Devi Sri Rajendran, Priyadharshini Bharathi, Elakiya Palanisamy, Anusri Sathiya Narayanan, Vinoth Kumar Vaidyanathan and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Food science and biotechnology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
10.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Applied and environmental microbiology · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Antimicrobial Compounds in Wine.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2024
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Safety Properties ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kirupa Sankar MuthuveluBioprocess and Bioproducts Special Laboratory, Department of Biotechnology, Bannari Amman Institute of Technology, Sathyamangalam, Erode, Tamil Nadu 638 401 India.
Baranitharan EthirajDepartment of Biotechnology, Saveetha School of Engineering, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600077 India.
Shreyasi PramnikIntegrated Bioprocessing Laboratory, School of Bioengineering, SRM Institute of Science and Technology (SRM IST), Kattankulathur, Tamil Nadu 603203 India.
N Keerthish RajIntegrated Bioprocessing Laboratory, School of Bioengineering, SRM Institute of Science and Technology (SRM IST), Kattankulathur, Tamil Nadu 603203 India.
Swethaa VenkataramanIntegrated Bioprocessing Laboratory, School of Bioengineering, SRM Institute of Science and Technology (SRM IST), Kattankulathur, Tamil Nadu 603203 India.
Devi Sri RajendranIntegrated Bioprocessing Laboratory, School of Bioengineering, SRM Institute of Science and Technology (SRM IST), Kattankulathur, Tamil Nadu 603203 India.
Priyadharshini BharathiIntegrated Bioprocessing Laboratory, School of Bioengineering, SRM Institute of Science and Technology (SRM IST), Kattankulathur, Tamil Nadu 603203 India.
Elakiya PalanisamyBioprocess and Bioproducts Special Laboratory, Department of Biotechnology, Bannari Amman Institute of Technology, Sathyamangalam, Erode, Tamil Nadu 638 401 India.
Anusri Sathiya NarayananBioprocess and Bioproducts Special Laboratory, Department of Biotechnology, Bannari Amman Institute of Technology, Sathyamangalam, Erode, Tamil Nadu 638 401 India.
Vinoth Kumar VaidyanathanIntegrated Bioprocessing Laboratory, School of Bioengineering, SRM Institute of Science and Technology (SRM IST), Kattankulathur, Tamil Nadu 603203 India.
Shanmugaprakash MuthusamyDownstream Processing Laboratory, Department of Biotechnology, Kumaraguru College of Technology, Coimbatore, India.
SRM Institute of Science and Technology · INSaveetha University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite centuries of developing strategies to prevent food-associated illnesses, food safety remains a significant concern, even with multiple technological advancements. Consumers increasingly seek less processed and naturally preserved food options. One promising approach is food biopreservation, which uses natural antimicrobials found in food with a long history of safe consumption and can help reduce the reliance on chemically synthesized food preservatives. The hurdle technology method that combines multiple antimicrobial strategies is often used to improve the effectiveness of food biopreservation. This review attempts to provide a research summary on the utilization of lactic acid bacteria, bacteriocins, endolysins, bacteriophages, and biopolymers helps in the improvement of the shelf-life of food and lower the risk of food-borne pathogens throughout the food supply chain. This review also aims to evaluate current technologies that successfully employ the aforementioned preservatives to address obstacles in food biopreservation.

Indexed as

BacteriocinsBacteriophagesBiopreservationEncapsulationEndolysinsLactic acid bacteria

Identifiers

PMID37457405
PMCPMC10348988
OpenAlexW4379209061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.