ArticleComputer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering. Imaging & visualization2023
A Tool-free Neuronavigation Method based on Single-view Hand Tracking.
Article in Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering. Imaging & visualization, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Women in neurosurgical oncology: Mapping the milestones and shaping the future.Neuro-oncology advances · 2026Review
- Keyhole Brain Surgery without Neuronavigation: Innovative Usage of Limited Available Resources.Asian journal of neurosurgery · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence integration in surgery through hand and instrument tracking: a systematic literature review.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Review
- Detection of hand motion during cadaveric mastoidectomy dissections: a technical note.Frontiers in surgery · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This work presents a novel tool-free neuronavigation method that can be used with a single RGB commodity camera. Compared with freehand craniotomy placement methods, the proposed system is more intuitive and less error prone. The proposed method also has several advantages over standard neuronavigation platforms. First, it has a much lower cost, since it doesn't require the use of an optical tracking camera or electromagnetic field generator, which are typically the most expensive parts of a neuronavigation system, making it much more accessible. Second, it requires minimal setup, meaning that it can be performed at the bedside and in circumstances where using a standard neuronavigation system is impractical. Our system relies on machine-learning-based hand pose estimation that acts as a proxy for optical tool tracking, enabling a 3D-3D pre-operative to intra-operative registration. Qualitative assessment from clinical users showed that the concept is clinically relevant. Quantitative assessment showed that on average a target registration error (TRE) of 1.3cm can be achieved. Furthermore, the system is framework-agnostic, meaning that future improvements to hand-tracking frameworks would directly translate to a higher accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.