Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37457354›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2023

Design, execution, and interpretation of plant RNA-seq analyses.

Racheal N Upton, Fernando H Correr, Jared Lile, Gillian L Reynolds, Kira Falaschi, Jason P Cook, Jennifer Lachowiec

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Racheal N UptonPlant Sciences and Plant Pathology, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, United States.
Fernando H CorrerPlant Sciences and Plant Pathology, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, United States.
Jared LilePlant Sciences and Plant Pathology, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, United States.
Gillian L ReynoldsPlant Sciences and Plant Pathology, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, United States.
Kira FalaschiPlant Sciences and Plant Pathology, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, United States.
Jason P CookPlant Sciences and Plant Pathology, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, United States.
Jennifer LachowiecPlant Sciences and Plant Pathology, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomics has transformed our understanding of the genetic architecture of traits and the genetic variation present in plants. Here, we present a review of how RNA-seq can be performed to tackle research challenges addressed by plant sciences. We discuss the importance of experimental design in RNA-seq, including considerations for sampling and replication, to avoid pitfalls and wasted resources. Approaches for processing RNA-seq data include quality control and counting features, and we describe common approaches and variations. Though differential gene expression analysis is the most common analysis of RNA-seq data, we review multiple methods for assessing gene expression, including detecting allele-specific gene expression and building co-expression networks. With the production of more RNA-seq data, strategies for integrating these data into genetic mapping pipelines is of increased interest. Finally, special considerations for RNA-seq analysis and interpretation in plants are needed, due to the high genome complexity common across plants. By incorporating informed decisions throughout an RNA-seq experiment, we can increase the knowledge gained.

Indexed as

allele-specific variationco-expression networksdifferential expressionexperimental designQTL mapping

Identifiers

PMID37457354
PMCPMC10348879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.