ArticleFrontiers in public health2023
Transforming the field: the role of academic health centers in promoting and sustaining equity based community engaged research.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tailored vs. General COVID-19 prevention for adults with mental disabilities residing in group homes: a randomized controlled effectiveness-implementation trial.BMC public health · 2024Trial
- Examining inclusive research practices to engage communities: a qualitative inquiry.BMC public health · 2026Article
- No short cuts: building trust in community-based research with ethnocultural groups.International journal for equity in health · 2026Article
- Building capacity, driving impact: A landscape analysis of community engagement and outreach cores' activities.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2026Article
- What does it take to support community-engaged research in an academic medical center? A mixed-methods study of community and academic perspectives.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2026Article
- Developing the engage for equity institutional multi-sector survey: Assessing academic institutional culture and climate for community-based participatory research (CBPR).Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- Assessing the context within academic health institutions toward improving equity-based, community and patient-engaged research.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- Engaging stakeholders to strengthen support for community-engaged research at Stanford School of Medicine: An institutional assessment and action planning approach.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- Institutional community engagement leader perspectives on supporting ethical community-engaged research.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- Identifying and addressing institutional barriers to community partner compensation for engaged research: A Clinical and Translational Science Award case study.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- Community/patient group champion team retrospective look at engage for equity PLUS: Results from a post-intervention champion team focus group.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- Engage for equity plus: Transforming academic health centers to sustain patient/community engaged research structures, policies, and practices.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- Adoption of E2PLUS tools and resources to promote the development of institutional capacity for patient-centered and community-engaged research at a cancer center.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- Nurses' perspectives on workplace environment needs associated to resilience: a qualitative descriptive study.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2024Article
- Community engagement and financial arrangements: Navigating institutional change.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Community-based participatory research (CBPR) and community engaged research (CEnR) are key to promoting community and patient engagement in actionable evidence-based strategies to improve research for health equity. Rapid growth of CBPR/CEnR research projects have led to the broad adoption of partnering principles in community-academic partnerships and among some health and academic organizations. Yet, transformation of principles into best practices that foster trust, shared power, and equity outcomes still remain fragmented, are dependent on individuals with long term projects, or are non-existent. This paper describes how we designed our Engage for Equity PLUS intervention that leverages the leadership and membership of champion teams (including community-engaged faculty, community partners and patient advocates) to improve organizational policies and practices to support equity based CBPR/CEnR. This article describes the feasibility and preliminary findings from engaging champion teams from three very different academic health centers. We reflect on the learnings from Engage for Equity PLUS; the adaptation of the intervention design and implementation, including the development of a new institutional assessment using mixed research methods; and our organizational theory of change. In summary, our design and preliminary data from the three academic health centers provide support for new attention to the role of institutional practices and processes needed to sustain equity-based patient and community-engaged research and CBPR and transform the field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.