Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37457186›Full record

ReviewFood science & nutrition2023

Nutritional, biochemical, and clinical applications of carob: A review.

Ali Ikram, Waseem Khalid, Khair-Ul- Wajeeha Zafar, Anwar Ali, Muhammad Faizan Afzal, Afifa Aziz, Izza Faiz Ul Rasool, Ammar Al-Farga, Faisal Aqlan, Hyrije Koraqi

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Food science & nutrition, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
10.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Evaluation of Commercial Carob Syrups (Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Ali IkramUniversity Institute of Food Science and Technology, The University of Lahore Lahore Pakistan.
Waseem KhalidUniversity Institute of Food Science and Technology, The University of Lahore Lahore Pakistan.
Khair-Ul- Wajeeha ZafarDepartment of Chemistry Government College University Faisalabad Pakistan.
Anwar AliDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, Xiangya School of Public Health Central South University Changsha China.
Muhammad Faizan AfzalDepartment of Food Science, Faculty of Life Sciences Government College University Faisalabad Pakistan.
Afifa AzizDepartment of Food Science, Faculty of Life Sciences Government College University Faisalabad Pakistan.
Izza Faiz Ul RasoolDepartment of Food Science, Faculty of Life Sciences Government College University Faisalabad Pakistan.
Ammar Al-FargaDepartment of Biochemistry, College of Sciences University of Jeddah Jeddah Saudi Arabia.
Faisal AqlanDepartment of Chemistry, College of Sciences Ibb University Ibb Governorate Yemen.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9424-3262
Hyrije KoraqiFaculty of Food Science and Biotechnology UBT-Higher Education Institution Pristina Kosovo.
Government College University, Faisalabad · PKUniversity of Lahore · PKCentral South University · CNIbb University · YEUniversity for Business and Technology · XKUniversity of Jeddah · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Carob is botanically called as

Indexed as

carobeconomicfood applicationlimitationsmedicinalnutritionpolyphenol

Identifiers

PMID37457186
PMCPMC10345664
OpenAlexW4380080304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.