Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37457165›Full record

ArticleFood science & nutrition2023

Effect of infection of potato plants by Potato virus Y (PVY), Potato virus S (PVS), and Potato virus M (PVM) on content and physicochemical properties of tuber starch.

Gulnazym Ospankulova, Vadim Khassanov, Svetlana Kamanova, Dana Toimbayeva, Saule Saduakhasova, Berdibek Bulashev, Gulnar Aidarkhanova, Yernaz Yermekov, Linara Murat, Bakhyt Shaimenova and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food science & nutrition, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Gulnazym OspankulovaDepartment of Food Technology and Processing Products, Technical Faculty Saken Seifullin Kazakh Agrotechnical University Nur-Sultan Kazakhstan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6043-4658
Vadim KhassanovDepartment of Biology, Plant Protection and Quarantine, Agronomic Faculty Saken Seifullin Kazakh Agrotechnical University Astana Kazakhstan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9054-5551
Svetlana KamanovaDepartment of Food Technology and Processing Products, Technical Faculty Saken Seifullin Kazakh Agrotechnical University Nur-Sultan Kazakhstan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9534-2721
Dana ToimbayevaDepartment of Food Technology and Processing Products, Technical Faculty Saken Seifullin Kazakh Agrotechnical University Nur-Sultan Kazakhstan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9595-0559
Saule SaduakhasovaDepartment of Food Technology and Processing Products, Technical Faculty Saken Seifullin Kazakh Agrotechnical University Nur-Sultan Kazakhstan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9483-5732
Berdibek BulashevDepartment of Food Technology and Processing Products, Technical Faculty Saken Seifullin Kazakh Agrotechnical University Nur-Sultan Kazakhstan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1831-3315
Gulnar AidarkhanovaDepartment of Food Technology and Processing Products, Technical Faculty Saken Seifullin Kazakh Agrotechnical University Nur-Sultan Kazakhstan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5108-8036
Yernaz YermekovDepartment of Food Technology and Processing Products, Technical Faculty Saken Seifullin Kazakh Agrotechnical University Nur-Sultan Kazakhstan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1441-9796
Linara MuratDepartment of Food Technology and Processing Products, Technical Faculty Saken Seifullin Kazakh Agrotechnical University Nur-Sultan Kazakhstan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5684-0621
Bakhyt ShaimenovaDepartment of Food Technology and Processing Products, Technical Faculty Saken Seifullin Kazakh Agrotechnical University Nur-Sultan Kazakhstan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5472-036X
Marat MuratkhanDepartment of Food Technology and Processing Products, Technical Faculty Saken Seifullin Kazakh Agrotechnical University Nur-Sultan Kazakhstan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7248-1531
Wenhao LiEngineering Research Center of Grain and Oil Functionalized Processing in Universities of Shaanxi Province, College of Food Science and Engineering Northwest A&F Yangling China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1631-7697
S.Seifullin Kazakh Agro Technical University · KZNorth West Agriculture and Forestry University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Potato virus Y (PVY), Potato virus S (PVS), and Potato virus M (PVM) infection of potato plants leads to decreased dry matter and starch content in tubers. Starch samples from potato tubers infected with PVY, PVS, and PVM had higher amylose content. Granules of starch isolated from potato tubers infected by PVS exhibit larger granules than starch granules isolated from tubers of healthy plants. In contrast, in the case of PVM and PVY infection, starch granules were significantly smaller in diameter. A decrease in the degree of crystallinity has been observed in all samples of starches obtained from the tubers of infected plants compared to starch isolated from tubers of healthy plants. A slight decrease in gelatinization temperature was noted for starch samples isolated from tubers infected by PVY and PVM, and a slight increase in gelatinization temperature for starch samples isolated from tubers infected by PVS compared to starch isolated from tubers of healthy plants. In all samples of starch obtained from tubers of infected plants, an increase in the value of gelatinization enthalpy was observed. Thus, it can be concluded that damage to potato plants by PVM and PVY leads to a significant decrease in the quality of starch in tubers. At the same time, infection by PVS had practically no considerable effect.

Indexed as

physicochemical propertiespotato tuberspotato virusstarch

Identifiers

PMID37457165
PMCPMC10345660
OpenAlexW4375843201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.