Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37457137›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in gastroenterology2023

Pilot study on a new endoscopic platform for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Roberta Maselli, Marco Spadaccini, Piera Alessia Galtieri, Matteo Badalamenti, Elisa Chiara Ferrara, Gaia Pellegatta, Antonio Capogreco, Silvia Carrara, Andrea Anderloni, Alessandro Fugazza and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Roberta MaselliDigestive Endoscopy Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, Milan 20089, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7291-9110
Marco SpadacciniDepartment of Biomedical Science, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
Piera Alessia GaltieriDigestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
Matteo BadalamentiDigestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
Elisa Chiara FerraraDigestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
Gaia PellegattaDigestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
Antonio CapogrecoDepartment of Biomedical Science, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
Silvia CarraraDigestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
Andrea AnderloniDigestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
Alessandro FugazzaDigestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
Cesare HassanDepartment of Biomedical Science, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
Alessandro RepiciDepartment of Biomedical Science, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
Humanitas University · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a technically demanding and time-consuming procedure, with an increased risk of adverse events compared to standard endoscopic resection techniques. The main difficulties are related to the instability of the operating field and to the loss of traction. We aimed to evaluate in a pilot trial a new endoscopic platform [tissue retractor system (TRS); ORISE, Boston scientific Co., Marlborough, MA, USA], designed to stabilize the intraluminal space, and to provide tissue retraction and counter traction. Method: We prospectively enrolled all consecutive patients who underwent an ESD for sigmoid/rectal lesions. The primary outcome was the rate of technical feasibility. Further technical aspects such as en-bloc and R0 resection rate, number of graspers used, circumferential incision time, TRS assemblage time, submucosal dissection time, and submucosal dissection speed were provided. Clinical outcomes (recurrence rate and adverse events) were recorded as well. Results: In all, 10 patients (M/F 4/6, age: 70.4 ± 11.0 years old) were enrolled. Eight out of 10 lesions were located in the rectum. Average lesion size was 31.2 ± 2.7 mm, and mean lesion area was 1628.88 ± 205.3 mm Conclusion: TRS-assisted ESD is a feasible option when used in the rectum, with promising result in terms of efficacy and safety outcomes. Nevertheless, our pilot study underlines few technical limitations of the present platform that need to be overcome before the system could be widely and routinely used.

Indexed as

colorectal cancerendoscopyESDhindgutinnovationmini-invasive

Identifiers

PMID37457137
PMCPMC10338719
OpenAlexW4383959700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.