Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37457117›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2023

Use of melatonin in children and adolescents with idiopathic chronic insomnia: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and clinical recommendation.

Henriette Edemann-Callesen, Henning Keinke Andersen, Anja Ussing, Anne Virring, Poul Jennum, Nanette Mol Debes, Torben Laursen, Lone Baandrup, Christina Gade, Jette Dettmann and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Melatonin: A Review of the Evidence for Use in Hospital Settings.Pharmacology research & perspectives · 2025
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Henriette Edemann-CallesenThe Danish Health Authority, 2300, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Henning Keinke AndersenThe Danish Health Authority, 2300, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Anja UssingThe Danish Health Authority, 2300, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Anne VirringDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Aarhus University Hospital, Psychiatry, Aarhus, Denmark.
Poul JennumDanish Centre for Sleep Medicine, Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Nanette Mol DebesDepartment of Pediatrics, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Herlev, Denmark.
Torben LaursenDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark.
Lone BaandrupDepartment of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Christina GadeDepartments of Clinical Pharmacology and Clinical Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jette DettmannDepartment of Pediatrics, Copenhagen University Hospital - NOH, Hillerød, Denmark.
Jonas HolmThe Occupational Therapist Association, Denmark.
Camilla KroghThe Danish Health Authority, 2300, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Kirsten BirkefossThe Danish Health Authority, 2300, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Simon TarpThe Danish Health Authority, 2300, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Mina Nicole HändelThe Danish Health Authority, 2300, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Danish Business Authority · DKUniversity of Copenhagen · DKAarhus University Hospital · DKCopenhagen University Hospital · DKRegion Zealand · DKRigshospitalet · DKUniversity of Southern Denmark · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Melatonin prescriptions for children and adolescents have increased substantially during the last decade. Existing clinical recommendations focus on melatonin as a treatment for insomnia related to neurodevelopmental disorders. To help guide clinical decision-making, we aimed to construct a recommendation on the use of melatonin in children and adolescents aged 5-20 years with idiopathic chronic insomnia. Methods: A systematic search for guidelines, systematic reviews and randomised controlled trials (RCT) were performed in Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, PsycInfo, Cinahl, Guidelines International Network, Trip Database, Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health, American Academy of Sleep Medicine, European Sleep Research Society and Scandinavian Health Authorities databases. A search for adverse events in otherwise healthy children and adolescents was also performed. The latest search for guidelines, systematic reviews, and adverse events was performed on March 18, 2023. The latest search for RCTs was performed on to February 6, 2023. The language was restricted to English, Danish, Norwegian, and Swedish. Eligible participants were children and adolescents (5-20 years of age) with idiopathic chronic insomnia, in whom sleep hygiene practices have been inadequate and melatonin was tested. There were no restrictions on dosage, duration of treatment, time of consumption, or release formula. Primary outcomes were quality of sleep, daytime functioning and serious adverse events. Secondary outcomes included total sleep time, sleep latency, awakenings, drowsiness, quality of life, all-cause dropouts, and non-serious adverse events. Outcomes were assessed at different time points to assess short-term and long-term effects. Meta-analysis was performed using inverse variance random-effects model and risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane risk of bias tool. If possible, funnel plots would be constructed to investigate publication bias. Heterogeneity was calculated via I Findings: We included eight RCTs with 419 children and adolescents with idiopathic chronic insomnia. Melatonin led to a moderate increase in total sleep time by 30.33 min (95% confidence interval (CI) 18.96-41.70, 4 studies, I Interpretation: Evidence of very low certainty shows that benefits are limited and unwanted events are likely when melatonin is used to treat otherwise healthy children and adolescents with chronic insomnia. Melatonin should never be the first choice of treatment for this particular population, yet carefully monitored short-term use may be considered if sleep hygiene practices and non-pharmacological interventions have proven inadequate, and only if daytime function is compromised. Funding: The Danish Health Authority and the Parker Institute, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital supported by the Oak Foundation.

Indexed as

Children and adolescentsChronic insomniaEvidence-based recommendationIdiopathicMelatonin

Identifiers

PMID37457117
PMCPMC10339205
OpenAlexW4383337819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.