ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2023
Emerging V1 neuronal ensembles with enhanced connectivity after associative learning.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Glioblastoma disrupts cortical network activity at multiple spatial and temporal scales.Nature communications · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The visual stimulus-specific responses in the primary visual cortex (V1) undergo plastic changes after associative learning. During the learning process, neuronal ensembles, defined as groups of coactive neurons, are well known to be related to learning and memory. However, it remains unclear what effect learning has on ensembles, and which neuronal subgroups within those ensembles play a key role in associative learning. Methods: We used two-photon calcium imaging in mice to record the activity of V1 neurons before and after fear conditioning associated with a visual cue (blue light). We first defined neuronal ensembles by thresholding their functional connectivity in response to blue (conditioned) or green (control) light. We defined neurons that existed both before and after conditioning as stable neurons. Neurons which were recruited after conditioning were defined as new neurons. The graph theory-based analysis was performed to quantify the changes in connectivity within ensembles after conditioning. Results: A significant enhancement in the connectivity strength (the average correlation with other neurons) was observed in the blue ensembles after conditioning. We found that stable neurons within the blue ensembles showed a significantly smaller clustering coefficient (the value represented the degree of interconnectedness among a node's neighbors) after conditioning than they were before conditioning. Additionally, new neurons within the blue ensembles had a larger clustering coefficient, similar relative degree (the value represented the number of functional connections between neurons) and connectivity strength compared to stable neurons in the same ensembles. Discussion: Overall, our results demonstrated that the plastic changes caused by conditioning occurred in subgroups of neurons in the ensembles. Moreover, new neurons from conditioned ensembles may play a crucial role in memory formation, as they exhibited not only similar connection competence in relative degree and connectivity strength as stable neurons, but also showed a significantly larger clustering coefficient compared to the stable neurons within the same ensembles after conditioning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.