Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37456983›Full record

ArticleCase reports in psychiatry2023

Catatonia, Pregnancy, and Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT).

Khushbu Gandhi, KieuHanh Nguyen, Maggie Driscoll, Zahid Islam, Siddhartha Maru

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Case reports in psychiatry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Khushbu GandhiDepartment of Psychiatry, Lehigh Valley Health Network, Bethlehem, PA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-9771-7852
KieuHanh NguyenDepartment of Psychiatry, Lehigh Valley Health Network, Bethlehem, PA, USA.
Maggie DriscollDepartment of Psychiatry, Lehigh Valley Health Network, Bethlehem, PA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6581-3342
Zahid IslamDepartment of Psychiatry, Lehigh Valley Health Network, Bethlehem, PA, USA.
Siddhartha MaruDepartment of Psychiatry, Lehigh Valley Health Network, Bethlehem, PA, USA.
Lehigh Valley Health Network · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Catatonia is a neuropsychiatric syndrome, which typically occurs in the context of another psychiatric or medical condition, with a significant morbidity and mortality risk. Significant medical conditions resulting from catatonia include nutritional deficiencies, skin ulcerations, electrolyte disturbances, aspiration pneumonia, and venous thromboembolism. As a result, prompt treatment is required. Gold standard treatment consists of benzodiazepines, followed by electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) if pharmacotherapy alone is ineffective. With pregnancy and catatonia, there is a high risk of adverse maternal/fetal outcomes, and the risks/benefits of treatment must be carefully considered. Case: Here, we present a case of a young pregnant woman with schizoaffective disorder whose catatonic state was not successfully resolved with lorazepam, therefore requiring ECT. Patient presented to the emergency department at 20 weeks of pregnancy, displaying symptoms of catatonia and psychosis. She was admitted to the inpatient behavioral health unit, where she was treated with lorazepam for catatonia. Treatment occurred in close collaboration with the obstetrics team. While initially, the patient appeared to have a positive response to lorazepam, she became increasingly catatonic with minimal oral intake, mutism, and urinary retention. As a result, she was transferred to the medical floor, where ECT was initiated due to the ineffectiveness of lorazepam. Her catatonia was successfully resolved with 12 total treatments of ECT; there were no adverse effects to the fetus. Patient delivered her baby at 39 weeks with no complications. She continued to receive inpatient psychiatric care until she was stable for discharge to an extended acute care unit. Objectives: In this report, we will review relevant literature on catatonia in pregnancy, with focus on treatment with ECT. Conclusions: Though the literature on these topics is limited and typically presented in case reports format, there appears to be a favorable view toward the use of ECT for pregnant catatonic patients. This case could be considered a vital contribution to the literature, as it provides a successful example of treating catatonia in pregnancy with no known adverse effects to the mother or child.

Identifiers

PMID37456983
PMCPMC10348863
OpenAlexW4383499436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.