Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37456915›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease2023

Clinicians' Perspectives of Wearable Technology to Detect and Monitor Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Mixed-Method Survey.

Malik A Althobiani, Bilal Khan, Amar J Shah, Yatharth Ranjan, Renata G Mendes, Amos Folarin, Swapna Mandal, Joanna C Porter, John R Hurst

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Malik A AlthobianiUCL Respiratory, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2230-5708
Bilal KhanUCL Respiratory, University College London, London, UK.
Amar J ShahUCL Respiratory, University College London, London, UK.
Yatharth RanjanDepartment of Health Informatics and Biostatistics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, Kings College London, London, UK.
Renata G MendesUCL Respiratory, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4683-2657
Amos FolarinDepartment of Health Informatics and Biostatistics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, Kings College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0333-1927
Swapna MandalUCL Respiratory, University College London, London, UK.
Joanna C PorterUCL Respiratory, University College London, London, UK.
John R HurstUCL Respiratory, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7246-6040
Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust · GBKing's College London · GBKing Abdulaziz University · SAUniversidade Federal de São Carlos · BRUniversity College Hospital · GBUniversity College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To investigate clinicians' perspectives on the current use of wearable technology for detecting COPD exacerbations, and to identify potential facilitators and barriers to its adoption in clinical settings. Methods: A mixed-method survey was conducted through an online survey platform involving clinicians working with COPD patients. The questionnaires were developed by an expert panel specialising in respiratory medicine at UCL. The questionnaire evaluated clinicians' perspectives on several aspects: the current extent of wearable technology utilisation, the perceived feasibility, and utility of these devices, as well as the potential facilitators and barriers that hinder its wider implementation. Results: Data from 118 clinicians were included in the analysis. Approximately 80% of clinicians did not currently use information from wearable devices in routine clinical care. A majority of clinicians did not have confidence in the effectiveness of wearables and their consequent impact on health outcomes. However, clinicians highlighted the potential value of wearables in helping deliver personalised care and more rapid assistance. Ease of use, technical support and accessibility of data were considered facilitating factors for wearable utilisation. Costs and lack of technical knowledge were the most frequently reported barriers to wearable utilisation. Conclusion: Clinicians' perspectives of the use of wearable technology to detect and monitor COPD exacerbations are variable. While accessibility and technical support facilitate wearable implementation, cost, technical issues, and knowledge act as barriers. Our findings highlight the facilitators and barriers to using wearables in patients with COPD and emphasise the need to assess patients' perspectives on wearable acceptability.

Indexed as

Pulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveWearable Electronic DevicesHumansSurveys and Questionnairesclinicians’ perspectivesCOPD exacerbationswearable technology

Identifiers

PMID37456915
PMCPMC10349580
OpenAlexW4383913663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.