Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37456907›Full record

ArticleWellcome open research2022

A PowerPack of SuperScientists: An innovative concept by African scientists to address gender bias and inequity in science.

Maphe Mthembu, Omolara Baiyegunhi, Yanga Mdleleni, Lerato Ndlovu, Hannah Keal, Kim Waddilove, Justin C Yarrow, Victoria Kasprowicz, Thumbi Ndung'u, Emily B Wong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Wellcome open research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Maphe MthembuAfrica Health Research Institute, Durban, 4001, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4209-9638
Omolara BaiyegunhiAfrica Health Research Institute, Durban, 4001, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8361-5534
Yanga MdleleniUniversity of KwaZulu-Natal, Nelson R. Mandela School of Medicine, Durban, 4001, South Africa.
Lerato NdlovuAfrica Health Research Institute, Durban, 4001, South Africa.
Hannah KealAfrica Health Research Institute, Durban, 4001, South Africa.
Kim WaddiloveAfrica Health Research Institute, Durban, 4001, South Africa.
Justin C YarrowCodeMakers NPC - SuperScientists, Durban, 4001, South Africa.
Victoria KasprowiczAfrica Health Research Institute, Durban, 4001, South Africa.
Thumbi Ndung'uAfrica Health Research Institute, Durban, 4001, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2962-3992
Emily B WongAfrica Health Research Institute, Durban, 4001, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4755-5380

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Underrepresentation of women in scientific leadership is a global problem. To understand and counter narratives that limit gender equity in African science, we conducted a public engagement campaign. Scientists representing six sub-Saharan African countries and multiple career stages used superhero imagery to create a diverse and unified team advocating for gender equity in science. In contrast to many traditional scientific environments and global campaigns, this "PowerPack of SuperScientists" was led by early-career Black female scientists whose perspectives are often under-represented in discussions about gender equity in science. The superhero imagery served as a powerful and fun antidote to imposter syndrome and helped to subvert traditional power structures based on age, race and sex. In an interactive social media campaign, the PowerPack developed insights into three themes: a) cultural stereotypes that limit women's scientific careers, b) the perception of a "conflict" between family and career responsibilities for women scientists, and c) solutions that can be adopted by key stakeholders to promote gender equity in African science. The PowerPack proposed solutions that could be undertaken by women working individually or collectively and interventions that require allyship from men, commitment from scientific institutions, and wider societal change. Further work is required to fully engage African scientists from even more diverse and disadvantaged backgrounds and institutions in these solutions and to enhance commitment by different stakeholders to achieving gender equity in science. Our experience suggests that creative tools should be used to subvert power dynamics and bring fresh perspectives and urgency to this topic.

Indexed as

African scienceBiasEarly career scientistsGender equityIntersectionality

Identifiers

PMID37456907
PMCPMC10338983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.