Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37456882›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2023

Establishment of a prognostic risk prediction modelfor non-small cell lung cancer patients with brainmetastases: a retrospective study.

Fei Hou, Yan Hou, Xiao-Dan Sun, Jia Lv, Hong-Mei Jiang, Meng Zhang, Chao Liu, Zhi-Yong Deng

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Construction of a survival prediction model and analysis of influencing factors for brain metastasis in non-small cell lung cancer based on multi‑parameter clinical data.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Fei Hou *Department of Nuclear Medicine, Yunnan Cancer Hospital (The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University), Kunming, Yunnan, China.
Yan Hou *Department of General Practice, China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.
Xiao-Dan SunDepartment of Publicity, Yunnan Cancer Hospital (The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University), Kunming, Yunnan, China.
Jia LvDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Yunnan Cancer Hospital (The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University), Kunming, Yunnan, China.
Hong-Mei JiangDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Yunnan Cancer Hospital (The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University), Kunming, Yunnan, China.
Meng ZhangDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Yunnan Cancer Hospital (The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University), Kunming, Yunnan, China.
Chao LiuDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Yunnan Cancer Hospital (The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University), Kunming, Yunnan, China.
Zhi-Yong DengDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Yunnan Cancer Hospital (The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University), Kunming, Yunnan, China.
Kunming Medical University · CNChina Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who develop brain metastases (BM) have a poor prognosis. This study aimed to construct a clinical prediction model to determine the overall survival (OS) of NSCLC patients with BM. Methods: A total of 300 NSCLC patients with BM at the Yunnan Cancer Centre were retrospectively analysed. The prediction model was constructed using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator-Cox regression. The bootstrap sampling method was employed for internal validation. The performance of our prediction model was compared using recursive partitioning analysis (RPA), graded prognostic assessment (GPA), the update of the graded prognostic assessment for lung cancer using molecular markers (Lung-molGPA), the basic score for BM (BSBM), and tumour-lymph node-metastasis (TNM) staging. Results: The prediction models comprising 15 predictors were constructed. The area under the curve (AUC) values for the 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (curves) were 0.746 (0.678-0.814), 0.819 (0.761-0.877), and 0.865 (0.774-0.957), respectively. The bootstrap-corrected AUC values and Brier scores for the prediction model were 0.811 (0.638-0.950) and 0.123 (0.066-0.188), respectively. The time-dependent C-index indicated that our model exhibited significantly greater discrimination compared with RPA, GPA, Lung-molGPA, BSBM, and TNM staging. Similarly, the decision curve analysis demonstrated that our model displayed the widest range of thresholds and yielded the highest net benefit. Furthermore, the net reclassification improvement and integrated discrimination improvement analyses confirmed the enhanced predictive power of our prediction model. Finally, the risk subgroups identified by our prognostic model exhibited superior differentiation of patients' OS. Conclusion: The clinical prediction model constructed by us shows promise in predicting OS for NSCLC patients with BM. Its predictability is superior compared with RPA, GPA, Lung-molGPA, BSBM, and TNM staging.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsChinaHumansModels, StatisticalPrognosisRetrospective StudiesBrain metastasisLASSO regressionNon-small cell lung cancerPredictorsPrognostic model

Identifiers

PMID37456882
PMCPMC10349557
OpenAlexW4384068126

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.