ReviewEuropean cardiology2023
Sex-based Differences in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Outcomes in Patients with Ischaemic Heart Disease.
Review in European cardiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Redesigning cardiovascular medicine around sex differences.Nature medicine · 2026Review
- Sex-Related Long-Term Outcomes in On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting-A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2026Article
- Time-Trends in Case-Fatality After Acute Myocardial Infarction Among Middle-Aged Lithuanian Adults, 2000-2023: Data from the Population-Based Kaunas Ischemic Heart Disease Register.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Sex disparities in coronary re-vascularisation and mortality.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Article
- Female Disparity in Referral to Cardiac Diagnostication and Invasive Treatment.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Sex differences in management and outcomes of people with ST-elevation myocardial infarction, New South Wales, 2011-2020: a retrospective cohort study.The Medical journal of Australia · 2025Article
- DDX60 protects ischemic myocardial injury and heart dysfunction by improving mitochondrial function via promoting Arl2 mRNA translation.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2025Article
- Sex-Stratified Long-Term Outcome After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Pooled Analysis of the SORT OUT All-Comer Trials.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Observational
- Galectin-3 Reflects Systemic Atherosclerosis in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Observational
- Sex-Based Risk Evaluation in Acute Coronary Events-A Study Conducted on an Eastern-European Population.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Impact of Percutaneous Coronary Interventions (PCIs) on Health Outcomes from a Jordanian Patient's Perspective.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Sex Differences in Outcomes After Contemporary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights From the PENDULUM Registry.JACC. Asia · 2025Article
- Sex-based Differences in Complications Following Percutaneous Coronary Interventions.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2025Review
- Time Trends in Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Meta-Analysis on Sex Differences.JACC. Advances · 2025Article
- Sex-Based Differences and Outcomes in Unselected Patients Undergoing Coronary Angiography.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Gender Is Not Predictor for Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Coronary Bifurcation.Korean circulation journal · 2025Article
- Gender related outcome differences in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Sex Disparities in In-Hospital Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction and a History of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG): A Cross-Sectional Study.Health science reports · 2024Article
- Trends in Patient Characteristics and Cardiothoracic Surgeries over 14 Years (2010-2023): A Single Center Experience.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In high-income countries, ischaemic heart disease is the leading cause of death in women and men, accounting for more than 20% of deaths in both sexes. However, women are less likely to receive guideline-recommended percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) than men. Women undergoing PCI have poorer unadjusted outcomes because they are older and have greater comorbidity than men, but uncertainty remains whether sex affects outcome after these differences in clinical characteristics are considered. In this paper, we review recent published evidence comparing outcomes between men and women undergoing PCI. We focus on the sex differences in PCI outcomes in different scenarios: acute coronary syndromes, stable angina and complex lesions, including the approach of left main coronary artery. We also review how gender is considered in recent guidelines and offer a common clinical scenario to illustrate the contemporary management strategies an interventional cardiologist should consider when performing PCI on a female patient.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.