Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37456706›Full record

ArticleReports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology2023

Deep inspiration breath hold: dosimetric benefits to decrease cardiac dose during postoperative radiation therapy for breast cancer patients.

Fabiana Accioli Miranda Degrande, Gustavo Nader Marta, Tatiana Midori Martins Teles Alves, Gustavo Bonfilho Squarizzi Ferreira, Fábio Vinicius Dumaszak, Heloisa A Carvalho, Samir A Hanna

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Fabiana Accioli Miranda DegrandeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Santa Paula Hospital, Santo Amaro, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Gustavo Nader MartaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Tatiana Midori Martins Teles AlvesDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Gustavo Bonfilho Squarizzi FerreiraDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Fábio Vinicius DumaszakDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Heloisa A CarvalhoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Samir A HannaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Hospital Sírio-Libanês · BRHospital Santa Paula · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Postoperative radiation therapy (RT) is the standard treatment for almost all patients diagnosed with breast cancer. Even with modern RT techniques, parts of the heart may still receive higher doses than those recommended by clinically validated dose limit restrictions, especially when the left breast is irradiated. Deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) may reduce irradiated cardiac volume compared to free breathing (FB) treatment. This study aimed to evaluate the dosimetric impact on the heart and left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) in FB and DIBH RT planning in patients with left breast cancer. Materials and methods: A retrospective cohort study of women diagnosed with left-sided breast cancer submitted to breast surgery followed by postoperative RT from 2015 to 2019. All patients were planned with FB and DIBH and hypofractionated dose prescription (40.05 Gy in 15 fractions). Results: 68 patients were included in the study. For the coverage of the planned target volume evaluation [planning target volume (PTV) eval] there was no significant difference between the DIBH versus FB planning. For the heart and LAD parameters, all constraints evaluated favored DIBH planning, with statistical significance. Regarding the heart, median V16.8 Gy was 2.56% in FB Conclusions: The DIBH technique has consistently demonstrated a significant dose reduction in the heart and LAD in all evaluated constraints, while keeping the same dose coverage in the PTV eval.

Indexed as

breast cancercardiotoxicitycoronary diseaseradiation therapy

Identifiers

PMID37456706
PMCPMC10348328
OpenAlexW4383888235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.