ArticleWorld neurosurgery: X2023
Machine learning-based classification of pineal germinoma from magnetic resonance imaging.
Article in World neurosurgery: X, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The role of artificial intelligence in diagnostic neurosurgery: a systematic review.Neurosurgical review · 2025Pooled it
- Prognosis of subarachnoid hemorrhage determined by intracranial pressure thresholds.Journal of cerebrovascular and endovascular neurosurgery · 2025Article
- Deep learning-based model for detection of intracranial waveforms with poor brain compliance in southern Thailand.Acute and critical care · 2025Article
- A comprehensive dataset of germinoma on MRI/CT with clinical and radiomic data.Scientific data · 2025Article
- A deep learning model for differentiating paediatric intracranial germ cell tumour subtypes and predicting survival with MRI: a multicentre prospective study.BMC medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Surgical approaches for tissue diagnosis of pineal tumors have been associated with morbidity and mortality. The classification of images by machine learning (ML) may assist physicians in determining the extent of resection and treatment plans for a specific patient. Therefore, the present study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performances of the ML-based models for distinguishing between pure and non-germinoma of the pineal area. In addition, the secondary objective was to compare diagnostic performances among feature extraction methods. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of patients diagnosed with pineal tumors. We used the RGB feature extraction, histogram of oriented gradients (HOG), and local binary pattern methods from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans; therefore, we trained an ML model from various algorithms to classify pineal germinoma. Diagnostic performances were calculated from a test dataset with several diagnostic indices. Results: MRI scans from 38 patients with pineal tumors were collected and extracted features. As a result, the k-nearest neighbors (KNN) algorithm with HOG had the highest sensitivity of 0.81 (95% CI 0.78-0.84), while the random forest (RF) algorithm with HOG had the highest sensitivity of 0.82 (95% CI 0.79-0.85). Moreover, the KNN model with HOG had the highest AUC, at 0.845. Additionally, the AUCs of the artificial neural network and RF algorithms with HOG were 0.770 and 0.713, respectively. Conclusions: The classification of images using ML is a viable way for developing a diagnostic tool to differentiate between germinoma and non-germinoma that will aid neurosurgeons in treatment planning in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.