Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37456690›Full record

ArticleWorld neurosurgery: X2023

Benchtop simulation of the retrosigmoid approach: Validation of a surgical simulator and development of a task-specific outcome measure score.

Simon C Williams, Razna Ahmed, Joseph Darlington Davids, Jonathan P Funnell, John Gerrard Hanrahan, Hugo Layard Horsfall, William Muirhead, Federico Nicolosi, Lewis Thorne, Hani J Marcus and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World neurosurgery: X, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Simon C WilliamsDepartment of Neurosurgery, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London, UK.
Razna AhmedWellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences (WEISS), London, UK.
Joseph Darlington DavidsDepartment of Neurosurgery, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London, UK.
Jonathan P FunnellDepartment of Neurosurgery, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London, UK.
John Gerrard HanrahanDepartment of Neurosurgery, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London, UK.
Hugo Layard HorsfallDepartment of Neurosurgery, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London, UK.
William MuirheadDepartment of Neurosurgery, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London, UK.
Federico NicolosiSchool of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy.
Lewis ThorneDepartment of Neurosurgery, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London, UK.
Hani J MarcusDepartment of Neurosurgery, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London, UK.
Patrick GroverDepartment of Neurosurgery, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Neurosurgical training is changing globally. Reduced working hours and training opportunities, increased patient safety expectations, and the impact of COVID-19 have reduced operative exposure. Benchtop simulators enable trainees to develop surgical skills in a controlled environment. We aim to validate a high-fidelity simulator model (RetrosigmoidBox, UpSurgeOn) for the retrosigmoid approach to the cerebellopontine angle (CPA). Methods: Novice and expert Neurosurgeons and Ear, Nose, and Throat surgeons performed a surgical task using the model - identification of the trigeminal nerve. Experts completed a post-task questionnaire examining face and content validity. Construct validity was assessed through scoring of operative videos employing Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) and a novel Task-Specific Outcome Measure score. Results: Fifteen novice and five expert participants were recruited. Forty percent of experts agreed or strongly agreed that the brain tissue looked real. Experts unanimously agreed that the RetrosigmoidBox was appropriate for teaching. Statistically significant differences were noted in task performance between novices and experts, demonstrating construct validity. Median total OSATS score was 14/25 (IQR 10-19) for novices and 22/25 (IQR 20-22) for experts ( Conclusion: The RetrosigmoidBox benchtop simulator has a high degree of content and construct validity and moderate face validity. The changing landscape of neurosurgical training mean that simulators are likely to become increasingly important in the delivery of high-quality education. We demonstrate the validity of a Task-Specific Outcome Measure score for performance assessment of a simulated approach to the CPA.

Indexed as

EducationMicrovascular decompressionModel validationNeurosurgeryRetrosigmoid craniotomySimulation training

Identifiers

PMID37456690
PMCPMC10344945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.