ArticleMedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources2023
Using a Mediator's Toolbox: Reducing Clinical Conflict by Learning to Reconceive the "Difficult" Patient or Family.
Article in MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Simulation Addressing Verbal Escalation (SAVE): An Interprofessional Simulation for Pediatric Health Care Professionals.MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources · 2026Article
- Harnessing Medical Bioethics Mediation to Advance One Health Governance.Veterinary sciences · 2025Review
- Anger De-escalation: A Standardized Patient Workshop for Third- and Fourth-Year Medical Students.MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources · 2025Article
- Patient trust in the health system, Internet information searching and the patient-provider relationship.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Ethical responses to violence toward health care workers.Journal of hospital medicine · 2024Article
- Towards a New Integrated Model for Taking Into Account the Experiential Knowledge of People With Chronic Diseases, Integrating Mediation, Therapeutic Education and Partnership: The Expanded Chronic Care Patient-Professional Partnership Model.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024Review
- Beyond the Question: Reexamining a Parent's Unusual Request.Pediatrics · 2024Article
- Applying a Trauma-Informed Lens to Challenging Adolescent Encounters: A Faculty Development Session for Pediatricians.MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Given the prevalence of conflict between physicians and patients and families, it is crucial that trainees build the skills to manage clinical conflict. Mediators employ an approach that can be applied to clinical encounters to prevent conflicts from escalating. This workshop introduced trainees to techniques commonly used by mediators to manage disputes. Methods: Medical students in a virtual workshop (cohort A) and clinical fellows in an in-person workshop (cohort B) were presented with a mediator's approach to interpreting patient and family behavior viewed as challenging. Trainees were introduced to two specific techniques designed to facilitate the resolution of clinical conflict. After an interactive large-group discussion of each method, small groups practiced applying the technique to a sample clinical case. Finally, participants completed an assessment of their perception of the workshop's effectiveness. Results: In early 2022, 15 medical students (cohort A) participated in a virtual workshop and 10 clinical fellows (cohort B) participated in an in-person workshop on clinical conflict management. Eight medical students from cohort A completed the postworkshop assessment (response rate: 53%); six clinical fellows from cohort B completed the assessment (response rate: 60%). Cohort A gave the workshop an overall evaluation of 4.6 out of 5.0; cohort B gave the workshop an overall score of 4.7 out of 5.0. Discussion: In both the virtual platform and the traditional in-person format, this workshop introduces a set of tools for navigating bedside conflicts with patients and their families that participants believed would better prepare them for such challenging interactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.