Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37456655›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2023

Acoustic analysis in stuttering: a machine-learning study.

Francesco Asci, Luca Marsili, Antonio Suppa, Giovanni Saggio, Elena Michetti, Pietro Di Leo, Martina Patera, Lucia Longo, Giovanni Ruoppolo, Francesca Del Gado and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Francesco AsciDepartment of Human Neurosciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Luca MarsiliDepartment of Neurology, James J. and Joan A. Gardner Center for Parkinson's Disease and Movement Disorders, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, United States.
Antonio SuppaDepartment of Human Neurosciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Giovanni SaggioDepartment of Electronic Engineering, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
Elena MichettiCRC - Centro Ricerca e Cura, Rome, Italy.
Pietro Di LeoDepartment of Electronic Engineering, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
Martina PateraDepartment of Human Neurosciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Lucia LongoDepartment of Sense Organs, Otorhinolaryngology Section, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Giovanni RuoppoloIRCCS San Raffaele Pisana, Rome, Italy.
Francesca Del GadoCRC - Centro Ricerca e Cura, Rome, Italy.
Donatella TomaiuoliCRC - Centro Ricerca e Cura, Rome, Italy.
Giovanni CostantiniDepartment of Electronic Engineering, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
Centro Ricerche FIAT · ITSapienza University of Rome · ITUniversity of Rome Tor Vergata · ITIstituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico San RaffaeleIstituto Neurologico Mediterraneo · ITUniversity of Cincinnati · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Stuttering is a childhood-onset neurodevelopmental disorder affecting speech fluency. The diagnosis and clinical management of stuttering is currently based on perceptual examination and clinical scales. Standardized techniques for acoustic analysis have prompted promising results for the objective assessment of dysfluency in people with stuttering (PWS). Objective: We assessed objectively and automatically voice in stuttering, through artificial intelligence (i.e., the support vector machine - SVM classifier). We also investigated the age-related changes affecting voice in stutterers, and verified the relevance of specific speech tasks for the objective and automatic assessment of stuttering. Methods: Fifty-three PWS (20 children, 33 younger adults) and 71 age-/gender-matched controls (31 children, 40 younger adults) were recruited. Clinical data were assessed through clinical scales. The voluntary and sustained emission of a vowel and two sentences were recorded through smartphones. Audio samples were analyzed using a dedicated machine-learning algorithm, the SVM to compare PWS and controls, both children and younger adults. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were calculated for a description of the accuracy, for all comparisons. The likelihood ratio (LR), was calculated for each PWS during all speech tasks, for clinical-instrumental correlations, by using an artificial neural network (ANN). Results: Acoustic analysis based on machine-learning algorithm objectively and automatically discriminated between the overall cohort of PWS and controls with high accuracy (88%). Also, physiologic ageing crucially influenced stuttering as demonstrated by the high accuracy (92%) of machine-learning analysis when classifying children and younger adults PWS. The diagnostic accuracies achieved by machine-learning analysis were comparable for each speech task. The significant clinical-instrumental correlations between LRs and clinical scales supported the biological plausibility of our findings. Conclusion: Acoustic analysis based on artificial intelligence (SVM) represents a reliable tool for the objective and automatic recognition of stuttering and its relationship with physiologic ageing. The accuracy of the automatic classification is high and independent of the speech task. Machine-learning analysis would help clinicians in the objective diagnosis and clinical management of stuttering. The digital collection of audio samples here achieved through smartphones would promote the future application of the technique in a telemedicine context (home environment).

Indexed as

acoustic analysishome environmentmachine-learningstutteringtelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID37456655
PMCPMC10347393
OpenAlexW4382787620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.