Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37456592›Full record

ArticleLocal and regional anesthesia2023

Regional Anesthetic Use in Trans-Hiatal Esophagectomy. Are They Worth Consideration? A Case Series.

William Mitchell, Thomas Roser, Jessica Heard, Shankar Logarajah, John Ok, John Jay, Houssam Osman, D Rohan Jeyarajah

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Local and regional anesthesia, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. [Epidural Analgesia in Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: Evidence and Practice].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

William Mitchell *Burnett School of Medicine at Texas Christian University, Fort Worth, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6338-2806
Thomas Roser *Burnett School of Medicine at Texas Christian University, Fort Worth, TX, USA.
Jessica HeardMethodist Richardson Medical Center, Richardson, TX, USA.
Shankar LogarajahMethodist Richardson Medical Center, Richardson, TX, USA.
John OkBurnett School of Medicine at Texas Christian University, Fort Worth, TX, USA.
John JayMethodist Richardson Medical Center, Richardson, TX, USA.
Houssam OsmanBurnett School of Medicine at Texas Christian University, Fort Worth, TX, USA.
D Rohan JeyarajahBurnett School of Medicine at Texas Christian University, Fort Worth, TX, USA.
Texas Christian University · USMethodist Richardson Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Esophagectomy traditionally has high levels of perioperative morbidity and mortality due to surgical techniques and case complexity. While thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) is considered first-line for postoperative analgesia after esophagectomy, complications can arise related to its sympathectomy and mobility impairment. Additionally, it has been shown that postoperative outcomes are improved with early extubation following esophagectomy. Our aim is to describe the impact of transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks on extubation rates following esophagectomy when uncoupled from TEA. Methods: This is a case series of 42 patients who underwent trans-hiatal esophagectomy between 2019 and 2022 who received a TAP block without TEA. The primary outcomes of interest were the rates of extubation within the operating room (OR) and reintubation. Secondary outcomes included: intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital length of stay (LOS), opioid pain medication use, post-operative hypotension, fluid administration, postoperative pain scores, development of anastomotic leak, and 30-day readmission. Results: The mean age at operation was 63 years and 97.6% of patients were represented by American Society of Anesthesia (ASA) physical status class III or IV. Thirty-four (81%) patients immediately extubated postoperatively. Nine patients (21.4%) underwent reintubation during their hospital course. Only seven patients (16.7%) required vasopressors postoperatively. The median LOS was five days in the ICU and 10 days in the hospital. TAP block alone was found to be equivalent to TAP with additional regional blocks (TAP+) on the basis of immediate extubation, reintubation, ICU and hospital LOS, and reported postoperative pain. Conclusion: The results of this study demonstrated immediate extubation is possible using TAP blocks while limiting post-operative hypotension and fluid administration. This was shown despite the elevated comorbidity burden of this study's population. Overall, this study supports the use of TAP blocks as a possible alternative for primary analgesia in patients undergoing trans-hiatal esophagectomy. Trial Registration: This study includes participants who were retrospectively registered. IRB# 037.HPB.2018.R.

Indexed as

analgesiablockepiduralERASesophagectomyQLquadratus lumborumTAPtrans-hiataltransversus abdominis plane

Identifiers

PMID37456592
PMCPMC10349603
OpenAlexW4383913691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.