Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37456509›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics advances2023

RegCFinder: targeted discovery of genomic subregions with differential read density.

Elena Weiß, Caroline C Friedel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics advances, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Elena WeißInstitute of Informatics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Amalienstr. 17, Munich 80333, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9252-5629
Caroline C FriedelInstitute of Informatics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Amalienstr. 17, Munich 80333, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3569-4877

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motivation: To date, no methods are available for the targeted identification of genomic subregions with differences in sequencing read distributions between two conditions. Existing approaches either only determine absolute read number changes, require predefined subdivisions of input windows or average across multiple genes. Results: Here, we present RegCFinder, which automatically identifies subregions of input windows with differences in read density between two conditions. For this purpose, the problem is defined as an instance of the all maximum scoring subsequences problem, which can be solved in linear time. Subsequently, statistical significance and differential usage of identified subregions are determined with DEXSeq. RegCFinder allows flexible definition of input windows to target the analysis to any regions of interests, e.g. promoters, gene bodies, peak regions and more. Furthermore, any type of sequencing assay can be used as input; thus, RegCFinder lends itself to a wide range of applications. We illustrate the usefulness of RegCFinder on two applications, where we can both confirm previous results and identify interesting gene subgroups with distinctive changes in read distributions. Availability and implementation: RegCFinder is implemented as a workflow for the workflow management system Watchdog and available at: https://github.com/watchdog-wms/watchdog-wms-workflows/. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at

Identifiers

PMID37456509
PMCPMC10343947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.