Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37456496›Full record

ReviewCureus2023

Safety and Efficacy of Ondansetron and Simvastatin as Potential Adjunctive Treatment for Patients With Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Kokab Irfan Khan, Roba Al Shouli, Akhil Allakky, Asila A Ferguson, Aujala Irfan Khan, Baraa Abuzainah, Sai Dheeraj Gutlapalli, Dipabali Chaudhuri, Pousette Hamid

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 49% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Innovative simvastatin-loaded emulgel effectively treats vulvovaginal candidiasis: in vivo efficacy and in vitro biopharmaceutical analysis.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kokab Irfan KhanResearch, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Roba Al ShouliPediatrics, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Akhil AllakkyInternal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Asila A FergusonPsychiatry, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Aujala Irfan KhanResearch, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Baraa AbuzainahGeneral Practice, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Sai Dheeraj GutlapalliInternal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Dipabali ChaudhuriResearch, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Pousette HamidNeurology, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences and Psychology (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In a generation where advancements in research and understanding have led to remarkable achievements in medicine, it is still unfathomable that, after more than a century, the cause of schizophrenia is still a mystery. While antipsychotics, without a doubt, have brought on an exemplary revolution in the way psychiatric disorders are now treated, there are still imperative deficits that need to be addressed to ultimately enable individuals with schizophrenia to function normally in society. However, without a definite cause of schizophrenia, even though speculation has been made on its inflammatory and neurodegenerative nature, it has provided an unnecessary hindrance to finding further potential treatment modalities for these patients. Nevertheless, some trials are investigating potential adjunctive treatment regimens to antipsychotics, which can help achieve complete remission. Exploring these drugs will have significant implications for managing schizophrenia in future clinical practices. This systematic review was conducted between January 2012 to July 2022 according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guidelines to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ondansetron and simvastatin as adjunctive treatment to antipsychotics in adult patients with schizophrenia. This review included nine randomized controlled trials. Overall, both simvastatin and ondansetron, when used as adjunctive treatment in schizophrenia, appear to be safe. Ondansetron showed promising results, with all studies on this drug showing positive overall results on schizophrenia symptoms. On the other hand, simvastatin demonstrated mixed results, which can be attributed to the limited participants in the studies and the shorter duration of the trials. However, more extensive trials with uniform assessment tools are needed to demonstrate concrete evidence of the effectiveness of these drugs, whether alone or in combination with each other or perhaps another drug such as aspirin in schizophrenia.

Indexed as

dsm-5icd-10ondansetronschizophreniasimvastatin

Identifiers

PMID37456496
PMCPMC10349656
OpenAlexW4380853986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.