ArticleCureus2023
Results of Neuropathy Screening Test for Lower Limb Amputees With Diabetes Mellitus and Their Prosthetic Rehabilitation: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction To prevent foot ulcers and subsequent amputation on the non-amputated side, we conducted tests for diabetic neuropathy. The results were then used in prosthetic rehabilitation for lower limb amputees with diabetes mellitus. Materials and methods This cross-sectional retrospective study included patients admitted to our convalescent rehabilitation ward for prosthetic rehabilitation between April 2019 and December 2022 following lower limb amputation due to diabetes. We investigated the positive rate of the modified Ipswich Touch Test (mIpTT) in lower limb amputees with diabetes, and physical and orthotic therapy and prosthetic rehabilitation based on medical records. Results Twenty-seven transtibial amputees and nine transfemoral amputees had diabetes. The mIpTT results were positive in 22 (81%) transtibial and eight (89%) transfemoral amputees. There were no apparent differences in positivity rates by amputation level, gender, or age. Based on these results, personalized physical therapy and insoles were prescribed for the non-amputee foot in parallel with prosthetic rehabilitation. Conclusions Lower limb amputees with diabetes have diabetic neuropathy more frequently than diabetic patients without amputation. As a result, they may also be at a higher risk of developing foot ulcers and subsequent amputation due to neuropathy. Therefore, rehabilitation to prevent amputation on the non-amputated side of lower limb amputees with diabetes had better encompassing foot exercises and orthotic therapy on the non-amputated side during the prosthetic rehabilitation period.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.