ArticleCureus2023
Fluoroscopy-Guided Metallic Foreign Body Removal: A Report of Three Cases and Literature Review.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Antegrade percutaneous retrieval of a retained metallic ureteral stent embedded in subcutaneous tissue: A practical fluoroscopy-guided approach.Radiology case reports · 2026Article
- Fluoroscopic-Guided Removal of a Retained Bullet From the Chest Under Local Anesthesia.Case reports in surgery · 2026Article
- Clinical characteristics and factors influencing hospitalization in pediatric patients with foreign body aspiration: a comprehensive analysis in an emergency department.International journal of emergency medicine · 2025Article
- Decade Later Presentation of an Intraosseous Metallic Foreign Body in the Pelvis: A Case Report and Literature Review.Journal of orthopaedic case reports · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ingested foreign objects that become trapped in the upper aerodigestive tract is a common issue that arises in Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery practice. In these circumstances, it is advised to explore the neck using an external method to remove the item. However, locating the foreign body might be challenging. Not all metallic foreign body (MFB) patients require surgery, especially those without symptoms or complications. The standard X-ray and CT images are routinely examined for preoperative assessment and localization. Removal can be accomplished via flexible pharyngo-laryngoscopy or upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Fluoroscopy is a widely accessible, minimally invasive, but underutilized tool during procedures. It offers an accurate intraoperative assessment of the foreign body in real-time. To allow the planning of a secure extraction pathway, the target should be radiopaque. In this report, we present three unique cases in which we used fluoroscopic imaging for guidance to remove a foreign body in the head and neck region in Prince Sultan Military Medical City in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. In the first case, a young male presented with a history of foreign body sensation and odynophagia in the throat after eating a (shawarma) sandwich. In the second case, a six-year-old boy presented to the emergency department (ED) with epistaxis after being exposed to an air gun shot to his face. In the third case, a 40- year-old male presented after exposure to an air gun shot to the neck. After identification of the foreign body, all three patients were referred to Otolaryngology-Head and Neck. After radiological images have been done to confirm the presence of foreign objects, all three had a minimally invasive procedure to remove the metallic foreign bodies under fluoroscopic guidance without needing extensive surgery. All the procedures went well with no immediate complications with discharge on the same day. Fluoroscopy-guided removal of foreign bodies related to metabolic forging is a promising technique with several advantages, including real-time visualization, reduced invasiveness, and shorter recovery times. However, it is essential to weigh the benefits against the risks associated with radiation exposure and inherent limitations in detecting non-metallic objects. Further research and clinical studies are needed to optimize this technique and establish evidence-based guidelines for its application in the field of metabolic forging bodies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.