ArticleCureus2023
Multi-exposure Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging (MECI)-Based Prediction of Blood Flow Using Random Forest (RF) With K-Means (KM).
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Blood flow prediction is very important for medical diagnosis, drug development, tissue engineering, and continuous monitoring. One commonly used method for studying blood flow is called multi-exposure laser speckle contrast imaging (MECI). It provides valuable insights into how blood flows through tissues and helps in diagnosing circulatory diseases. In our study, we used MECI to measure blood flow in real-time by taking multiple measurements with different exposure times and contrasts. To predict different blood flow rates ranging from 0.1 to 1 mm/s, we employed machine learning (ML) techniques like clustering and random forest (RF) or support vector machine (SVM) algorithms. The study showed that RF with K-means performance is found to be the most accurate technique for flow classification, with an accuracy of 98.5%, a precision of 92%, a specificity of 98.9%, and a classification error of 1.5%. Our study demonstrates that employing clustering and RF algorithms in MECI provides a robust and effective approach to predicting blood flow. This technique holds great potential for a wide range of applications in the medical and healthcare fields.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.