ArticleCureus2023
Concurrent Pacemaker Lead Perforation and Subacute Coronary Stent Thrombosis: A Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Stent thrombosis and lead perforation are important differentials for patients presenting with chest pain following recent coronary stent insertion and pacemaker insertion. In this report, we describe an unusual case of a 78-year-old male who presented with sharp chest pain one week after admission for posterior ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and subsequent Mobitz type II block, for which he received primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) to the left circumflex artery (LCx) and dual chamber permanent pacemaker (PPM) insertion. Computed tomography (CT) chest and CT coronary angiogram (CTCA), respectively, showed he had concurrent lead perforation and stent thrombosis. On balance, the cause of chest pain was likely lead perforation. This diagnosis was reached by having a high index of suspicion for both of these important post-procedure complications and investigating appropriately.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.