ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2023
Clinical evaluation of white matter lesions on 3D inversion recovery ultrashort echo time MRI in multiple sclerosis.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping Shows Size-dependent Focused Ultrasound-mediated Therapeutic Delivery to Naive Brain and Gliomas in Mice.Radiology · 2026Article
- Enhancing the Visibility of Multiple Sclerosis Lesions using Fused Images of Fluid Attenuated Inversion Recovery (FLAIR) and white matter Attenuated Inversion Recovery (WAIR) MRI Sequences.Current medical imaging · 2026Article
- Effects of Motion in Ultrashort Echo Time Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping for Musculoskeletal Imaging.Journal of imaging · 2025Article
- Novel fat suppression technique for ultrashort echo time MRI using single-point Dixon phase modeling.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Hemosiderin quantification in hemophilic arthropathy using quantitative magnetic resonance imaging.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Dilated lenticulostriate artery on whole-brain vessel wall imaging differentiates pathogenesis and predicts clinical outcomes in single subcortical infarction.European radiology · 2025Article
- Quantitative ultrashort echo time MR imaging of knee osteochondral junction: An ex vivo feasibility study.NMR in biomedicine · 2024Article
- Advanced MRI Techniques: Diagnosis and Follow-Up of Multiple Sclerosis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Association of vulnerable plaques with white matter hyperintensities on high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Article
- Bibliometric analysis of myelin imaging studies of patients with multiple sclerosis (2000-2022).Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: We clinically evaluated the quality of white matter lesions (WML) of the cerebrum on 3D inversion recovery ultrashort echo time (IR-UTE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients. Methods: Forty-nine patients with MS were included in this study. A 3T MRI scanner was used. Two radiologists (readers) evaluated the quality of WML on IR-UTE images using a three-point Likert scale (1-good quality, 2-moderate quality, 3-insufficient quality). They also rated other WML-related factors potentially influencing WML quality using another three-point Likert scale (1-no/minor impact, 2-moderate impact, 3-high impact). Another reader rated the presence of WML on IR-UTE to evaluate the diagnostic value (right/false positive and false negative) of IR-UTE in detecting WML. Signal intensity ratios (SIRs) derived from WML signal intensities and WML sizes were also determined and analyzed. Results: Two hundred and seventy-five MS lesions were evaluated. 87% of the lesions were rated Likert 1 on IR-UTE (P<0.01). WML rated Likert 2 and 3 presented near the grey matter (GM) in 58% of the cases (n=21), with 14 lesions being ≤2 mm (P=0.03). 62.5% of the WML rated Likert 2/3 were in the temporal lobe (P=0.02). The mean SIR of WML on IR-UTE was 1.14±0.22, while the mean SIR on fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) was 6.97±1.88. There was no significant correlation of SIRs between IR-UTE and FLAIR (R=0.14, P=0.245). 92.4% of the WML were correctly detected on IR-UTE (n=254). 19 out of the 21 false positive/negative rated WML were located near the GM or in the temporal lobe. WML presented 7.7% smaller in mean on IR-UTE compared to FLAIR. Factors affecting WML quality with a moderate or high impact (Likert 2 and 3) were not found. Conclusions: Most WML are clearly detectable on IR-UTE sequences. The main limitations are WML in the temporal lobe and near the GM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.