ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2023
A lightweight neural network for lung nodule detection based on improved ghost module.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Performance of multi-planar volume rendering versus maximum intensity projection and minimum intensity projection on pulmonary nodule detection.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Accuracy-Efficiency Trade-Off: Optimizing YOLOv8 for Structural Crack Detection.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Localization and Classification of Adrenal Masses in Multiphase Computed Tomography: Retrospective Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Research trends of artificial intelligence and radiomics in lung cancer: a bibliometric analysis.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Article
- Study on the application of deep learning artificial intelligence techniques in the diagnosis of nasal bone fracture.International journal of burns and trauma · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Computer tomography images are the preferred method of preoperative evaluation for lung disease. However, it remains difficult to detect and recognize nodules accurately and efficiently due to poor data imaging quality, heavy reliance on physician experience and the need for more human-computer interaction for diagnosis. Currently, image nodule detection based on deep convolutional neural networks has gained much momentum. Methods: To alleviate doctors' tremendous labor in the diagnosis procedure, and improve the accuracy of intelligent detection of lung nodules, we improved GhostNet and proposed a lightweight neural network for object detection for lung nodule image detection. Firstly, the bneck structure in the backbone feature extraction network is adopted and improved from the structure of MobileNetV3. The weights are adjusted by changing the initial channel attention mechanism and introducing a spatial-temporal attention mechanism. Then, in the enhanced feature extraction part, we mainly use depth-separable convolution blocks to replace the 3×3 convolution of the original network for the purpose of reducing the model parameters, and make more improvements based on the network structure to enhance the applicability of the network. Diagnostic precision, recall, F1-score, mAP and parameter count were calculated. Results: According to our lightweight neural network, F1-score, precision, and recall were 0.87, 86.34%, and 86.69%, respectively. Based on our dataset, the Yolov4-GNet network proposed in this research outperforms the current neural networks on both precision and recall as well as F1. Conclusions: The lung nodule detection method proposed in this research not only simplifies the processing of images, but also outperforms comparable methods in nodule detection rate and positioning accuracy, providing a new way for lung nodule detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.