Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37456286›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2023

Automatic segmentation of the female pelvic floor muscles on MRI for pelvic floor function assessment.

Xiaoqin Zhang, Yongjia Xiang, Jie Yao, Xin Hu, Yangyun Wang, Liping Liu, Yan Wang, Yi Wu

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Xiaoqin ZhangDepartment of Digital Medicine, College of Biomedical Engineering and Medical Imaging, Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Chongqing, China.
Yongjia XiangSchool of Mathematical Sciences, Chongqing Normal University, Chongqing, China.
Jie YaoDepartment of Digital Medicine, College of Biomedical Engineering and Medical Imaging, Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Chongqing, China.
Xin HuDepartment of Digital Medicine, College of Biomedical Engineering and Medical Imaging, Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Chongqing, China.
Yangyun WangDepartment of Urology, Fifth People's Hospital of Shanghai Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Liping LiuDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, First Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Yan WangSchool of Mathematical Sciences, Chongqing Normal University, Chongqing, China.
Yi WuDepartment of Digital Medicine, College of Biomedical Engineering and Medical Imaging, Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Chongqing, China.
Army Medical University · CNFudan University · CNChongqing Medical University · CNChongqing Normal University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a pelvic floor dysfunction disease which affects females. The volume of pelvic floor muscle, especially the levator ani muscle (LAM), is an important indicator of pelvic floor function. However, muscle volume measurements depend on manual segmentation, which is clinically time-consuming. In this work, we present an efficient automatic segmentation model of pelvic floor muscles with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) based on DenseUnet, to achieve muscle volume calculation and provide a reference for the assessment of pelvic floor function. Methods: A total of 49 female pelvic floor magnetic resonance (MR) series were retrospectively enrolled from the First Affiliated Hospital of Army Military Medical University between 2013 and 2021, including 21 normal participants and 28 patients with stage 1-4 POP. The LAM, internal obturator muscle (IOM), and external anal sphincter (EAS) were manually segmented. An improved DenseUnet was proposed for automatic segmentation of these 3 muscles. The Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), Hausdorff distance (HD), and average symmetrical surface distance (ASSD) were used to evaluate segmentation results. The segmentation performance of the improved DenseUnet was compared with those of standard DenseUnet, ResUnet, Unet++, and Unet. Results: The improved DenseUnet showed a good performance. The average DSC and standard deviation of the LAM, IOM, and EAS was 0.758±0.151, 0.716±0.173, and 0.810±0.147, respectively. The average HD was 22.41, 19.00, and 36.01 mm, respectively; and the average ASSD was 3.66, 3.80, and 5.23 mm, respectively. The average DSC and standard deviation of the normal group and POP group was 0.779±0.166 and 0.757±0.154, respectively. There was no significant difference between the muscle volume of the improved DenseUnet and manual segmentation (all P values >0.05). The average total segmentation time for 1 case was 10.18 s on our setup, which is much lower than the manual segmentation time of 45 minutes. Conclusions: The improved DenseUnet segments the pelvic floor muscles in MRI quickly and efficiently, with good precision and faster speed than those of manual segmentation. This can assist doctors in quickly segmenting pelvic floor muscles, calculating muscle volume, and further evaluating pelvic floor function.

Indexed as

DenseUnetlevator ani muscle (LAM)magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)pelvic floor musclesSegmentation

Identifiers

PMID37456286
PMCPMC10347332
OpenAlexW4381951096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.