Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37456239›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023

Re-irradiation for head and neck cancer: outcome and toxicity analysis using a prospective single institution database.

Chiara Scolari, André Buchali, Achim Franzen, Robert Förster, Paul Windisch, Stephan Bodis, Daniel R Zwahlen, Christina Schröder

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Chiara ScolariDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Ruppin-Brandenburg, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane (MHB), Neuruppin, Germany.
André BuchaliDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Ruppin-Brandenburg, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane (MHB), Neuruppin, Germany.
Achim FranzenDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Ruppin-Brandenburg, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane (MHB), Neuruppin, Germany.
Robert FörsterDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur (KSW), Winterthur, Switzerland.
Paul WindischDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur (KSW), Winterthur, Switzerland.
Stephan BodisCenter for Radiation Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Aarau and Baden (KSA-KSB), Aarau/Baden, Switzerland.
Daniel R ZwahlenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur (KSW), Winterthur, Switzerland.
Christina SchröderDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur (KSW), Winterthur, Switzerland.
Kantonsspital Winterthur · CHMedizinische Hochschule Brandenburg Theodor Fontane · DEKantonsspital Aarau · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Re-irradiation (re-RT) in head and neck cancer is challenging. This study prospectively explored the feasibility of re-RT in patients with loco-regionally recurrent or second primary head and neck cancer (LRR/SP HNC). Methods: From 2004 to 2021, 61 LRR/SP HNC patients were treated with re-RT, defined as having a second course of RT with curative intent resulting in a cumulative dose of ≥100 Gy in an overlapping volume. Postoperative or definitive dynamic intensity-modulated and/or volumetric modulated re-RT was administered using twice daily hyperfractionation to 60 Gy combined with cisplatin or carboplatin/5-fluorouracil. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), locoregional control (LRC) and distant metastasis control (DMC) were analyzed and prognostic factors evaluated. Toxicity was prospectively recorded and graded. Results: The median follow-up was 9.8 months. In 41 patients (67.1%), complete administration of the intended treatment was not feasible. In 9 patients (15%) re-RT was interrupted prematurely and in other 9, the complete re-RT dose was lower than 60 Gy, and 37 patients (61%) could not receive or complete chemotherapy. Two-year OS, PFS and LRC rates were 19%, 18% and 30%, respectively. 20 patients (33%) received the complete intended treatment, and 1- and 2-year OS rates were 70% and 47%, respectively. Charlson comorbidity index was an important predictor for treatment completion. Multivariate analysis revealed recurrent N stage 0-1, age, chemotherapy administration and re-RT dose of 60 Gy as prognostic factors for clinical outcomes. No grade 5 re-RT-related toxicity was observed. The most common new grade ≥3 acute toxicities were dysphagia (52%) and mucositis (46%). Late toxicity included grade ≥3 dysphagia in 5% and osteoradionecrosis in 10% of evaluable patients, respectively. 6 patients (10%) were alive after 9 years without progression and no late toxicity grade ≥3, except for 2 patients presenting with osteoradionecrosis. Conclusion: Hyperfractionated re-RT with 60 Gy combined with platinum-based chemotherapy was a curative treatment option with acceptable toxicity in LRR/SP patients. Patients with higher comorbidity had a higher probability of failing to receive and complete the intended therapy. Consequently, they derived unsatisfactory benefits from re-RT, highlighting the importance of patient selection.

Indexed as

head and neck cancerlocoregional controlloco-regionally recurrencere-irradiationsecond primarysurvivaltoxicity

Identifiers

PMID37456239
PMCPMC10346436
OpenAlexW4382776305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.