Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37456209›Full record

Trial reportIranian journal of medical sciences2023

Efficacy of Isoflurane-Remifentanil versus Propofol-Remifentanil on Controlled Hypotension and Surgeon Satisfaction in Rhinoplasty: A Single-Blind Clinical Trial Study.

Laleh Dehghanpisheh, Mohammad Ali Sahmeddini, Reza Kaboodkhani, Kazem Samadi, Saeed Khademi, Zahra Rafati, Sanaz Abbasi, Razieh Abbasi

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Iranian journal of medical sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Laleh DehghanpishehAnesthesiology and Critical Care Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Mohammad Ali SahmeddiniAnesthesiology and Critical Care Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Reza KaboodkhaniOtolaryngology Research Center, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Kazem SamadiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Shahid Dastgheib Hospital, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Saeed KhademiAnesthesiology and Critical Care Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Zahra RafatiAnesthesiology and Critical Care Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Sanaz AbbasiAnesthesiology and Critical Care Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Razieh AbbasiAnesthesiology and Critical Care Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Shiraz University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Rhinoplasty is a complex but popular surgery in Iran. The main complications of the surgery are post-operative bleeding and nasal septal hematoma due to poor intra-operative controlled hypertension. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of isoflurane-remifentanil (I-R) versus propofol-remifentanil (P-R) to induce controlled hypotension and to assess surgeon satisfaction with each of these combinations during rhinoplasty. Methods: In 2020-2021, a single-blind clinical study was conducted on 98 patients aged 18-50 years undergoing rhinoplasty at Mother and Child Hospital (Shiraz, Iran). Patients were randomly divided into P-R (n=48) and I-R (n=50) groups. Changes in systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), and heart rate (HR) were assessed during surgery and in the recovery room. A questionnaire was used to evaluate the level of surgeon satisfaction. Data were analyzed using independent samples Results: Five minutes after anesthesia induction, the P-R combination had a greater effect on reducing SBP (P=0.010), DBP (P=0.007), MAP (P=0.003), and HR (P=0.026) than I-R. However, from the 40 Conclusion: Both P-R and I-R combinations are recommended to induce hypotension during rhinoplasty. However, I-R is more effective than P-R in inducing the desired controlled hypotension.

Indexed as

HypotensionHypotension, ControlledIsofluranePropofolRhinoplastySurgeonsAnesthetics, IntravenousChildHumansPersonal SatisfactionPiperidinesRemifentanilSingle-Blind MethodAnesthetics, IntravenousIsofluranePiperidinesPropofolRemifentanilHypotensionIsofluranePropofolRemifentanilRhinoplasty

Identifiers

PMID37456209
PMCPMC10349152
OpenAlexW4384493102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.