Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37456091›Full record

ArticleClinical diabetes : a publication of the American Diabetes Association2023

Increasing Use of Diabetes Devices: What Do Health Care Professionals Need?

Laurel H Messer, Tim Vigers, Halis K Akturk, Gregory P Forlenza, Kelsey B Huss, Angela J Karami, Emily Malecha, Sean M Oser, Sarit Polsky, Laura Pyle and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical diabetes : a publication of the American Diabetes Association, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Assessing the iLet Bionic Pancreas Deployed in Primary Care and via Telehealth: A Randomized Clinical Trial.Clinical diabetes : a publication of the American Diabetes Association · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Laurel H MesserUniversity of Colorado School of Medicine, Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, Aurora, CO.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7493-0989
Tim VigersUniversity of Colorado School of Public Health, Department of Biostatistics and Informatics, Aurora, CO.
Halis K AkturkUniversity of Colorado School of Medicine, Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, Aurora, CO.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4518-5179
Gregory P ForlenzaUniversity of Colorado School of Medicine, Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, Aurora, CO.
Kelsey B HussUniversity of Colorado School of Medicine, Department of Family Medicine, Aurora, CO.
Angela J KaramiUniversity of Colorado School of Medicine, Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, Aurora, CO.
Emily MalechaUniversity of Colorado School of Medicine, Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, Aurora, CO.
Sean M OserUniversity of Colorado School of Medicine, Department of Family Medicine, Aurora, CO.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9640-3087
Sarit PolskyUniversity of Colorado School of Medicine, Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, Aurora, CO.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7602-0396
Laura PyleUniversity of Colorado School of Public Health, Department of Biostatistics and Informatics, Aurora, CO.
Viral N ShahUniversity of Colorado School of Medicine, Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, Aurora, CO.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3827-7107
R Paul WadwaUniversity of Colorado School of Medicine, Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, Aurora, CO.
Tamara K OserUniversity of Colorado School of Medicine, Department of Family Medicine, Aurora, CO.
University of Colorado Denver · USColorado School of Public Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite evidence of improved diabetes outcomes with diabetes technology such as continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems, insulin pumps, and hybrid closed-loop (HCL) insulin delivery systems, these devices are underutilized in clinical practice for the management of insulin-requiring diabetes. This low uptake may be the result of health care providers' (HCPs') lack of confidence or time to prescribe and manage devices for people with diabetes. We administered a survey to HCPs in primary care, pediatric endocrinology, and adult endocrinology practices in the United States. Responding HCPs expressed a need for device-related insurance coverage tools and online data platforms with integration to electronic health record systems to improve diabetes technology uptake in these practice settings across the United States.

Identifiers

PMID37456091
PMCPMC10338282
OpenAlexW4324386238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.