Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37456058›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2023

Vemurafenib induces a noncanonical senescence-associated secretory phenotype in melanoma cells which promotes vemurafenib resistance.

Jianyu Peng, Zijun Lin, Weichun Chen, Jie Ruan, Fan Deng, Lin Yao, Minla Rao, Xingdong Xiong, Shun Xu, Xiangning Zhang and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jianyu PengGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Medical Molecular Diagnostics, The First Dongguan Affiliated Hospital, Guangdong Medical University, Dongguan, 523000, China.
Zijun LinGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Medical Molecular Diagnostics, The First Dongguan Affiliated Hospital, Guangdong Medical University, Dongguan, 523000, China.
Weichun ChenGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Medical Molecular Diagnostics, The First Dongguan Affiliated Hospital, Guangdong Medical University, Dongguan, 523000, China.
Jie RuanInstitute of Aging Research, School of Medical Technology, Guangdong Medical University, Dongguan, 523000, China.
Fan DengDepartment of Cell Biology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, China.
Lin YaoGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Medical Molecular Diagnostics, The First Dongguan Affiliated Hospital, Guangdong Medical University, Dongguan, 523000, China.
Minla RaoGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Medical Molecular Diagnostics, The First Dongguan Affiliated Hospital, Guangdong Medical University, Dongguan, 523000, China.
Xingdong XiongGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Medical Molecular Diagnostics, The First Dongguan Affiliated Hospital, Guangdong Medical University, Dongguan, 523000, China.
Shun XuGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Medical Molecular Diagnostics, The First Dongguan Affiliated Hospital, Guangdong Medical University, Dongguan, 523000, China.
Xiangning ZhangDepartment of Pathophysiology, Chinese-American Tumor Institute, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Medical Molecular Diagnostics, Guangdong Medical University, Dongguan, 523808, China.
Xinguang LiuGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Medical Molecular Diagnostics, The First Dongguan Affiliated Hospital, Guangdong Medical University, Dongguan, 523000, China.
Xuerong SunGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Medical Molecular Diagnostics, The First Dongguan Affiliated Hospital, Guangdong Medical University, Dongguan, 523000, China.
Guangdong Medical College · CNGuangzhou University of Chinese Medicine · CNSouthern Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

More than one half melanoma patients have BRAF gene mutation. BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib is an effective medication for these patients. However, acquired resistance is generally inevitable, the mechanisms of which are not fully understood. Cell senescence and senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP) are involved in extensive biological functions. This study was designed to explore the possible role of senescent cells in vemurafenib resistance. The results showed that vemurafenib treatment induced BRAF-mutant but not wild-type melanoma cells into senescence, as manifested by positive β-galactosidase staining, cell cycle arrest, enlarged cellular morphology, and cyclin D1/p-Rb pathway inhibition. However, the senescent cells induced by vemurafenib (SenV) did not display DNA damage response, p53/p21 pathway activation, reactive oxygen species accumulation, decline of mitochondrial membrane potential, or secretion of canonical SASP cytokines. Instead, SenV released other cytokines, including CCL2, TIMP2, and NGFR, to protect normal melanoma cells from growth inhibition upon vemurafenib treatment. Xenograft experiments further confirmed that vemurafenib induced melanoma cells into senescence in vivo. The results suggest that vemurafenib can induce robust senescence in BRAF

Indexed as

BRAF inhibitorsCell senescenceCytokinesMelanomaResistanceVemurafenib

Identifiers

PMID37456058
PMCPMC10345356
OpenAlexW4382932786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.