ArticleHeliyon2023
A novel congenital diaphragmatic hernia prediction model for Chinese subjects: A multicenter cohort investigation.
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bibliometric analysis of congenital diaphragmatic hernia research models: evolution and insights from the past three decades.Pediatric surgery international · 2026Review
- Development of a prediction nomogram for 1-month mortality in neonates with congenital diaphragmatic hernia.BMC surgery · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose of the study: Brindle et al. (2014) and the Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Study Group constructed a simplified clinical prediction rule (Brindle score) to stratify infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia based on disease severity. We aimed to develop a predictive model applicable to Chinese patients with congenital diaphragmatic hernia and externally validate whether the Brindle score is applicable to the Chinese population. Patients and the methods: Multiple imputations supplemented the missing data. A least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression was used to screen the factors influencing adverse outcomes. Internal validation was performed by bootstrap resampling. The C-index, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, and the Hosmer-Lemeshow test evaluated the predictive power. Results: A nomogram named "CCDH score" (Chinese Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia score), including pulmonary hypertension, low 5-min Apgar score (<7), chromosomal anomaly, major cardiac anomalies (MCAs), observed-to-expected lung-to-head ratio, and the percentage of liver herniation, was constructed. The CCDH score revealed good calibration and discriminative abilities, with a C-index of 0.941. In the training and external validation cohorts, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the Brindle score were 0.820 and 0.881, respectively. The Brindle score has fair predictive power in the Chinese population, but the newly established CCDH score seems more suitable for Chinese patients with congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Conclusion: The CCDH score is the first predictive model constructed based on the characteristics of the Chinese population and can accurately predict the survival outcomes of patients with congenital diaphragmatic hernia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.