ArticleHeliyon2023
Effect of surface treatment on the repair bond strength of OMNICHROMA and Charisma Diamond ONE resin composites bonded to variable substrates.
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nanocarrier-Enabled Delivery of Glucosinolates for Skin Cancer Prevention and Therapy.The AAPS journal · 2026Review
- Article
- An in vitro study to compare shear bond strength of aged composite to two single-shade composites.Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2024Article
- Effect of Silane-Containing Adhesives on Repair Bond Strength between Fresh and Aged Composite Materials-A Pilot Study.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To compare repair bond strength of OMNICHROMA and Charisma Diamond ONE resin composites bonded to variable composite substrates. Also, to evaluate the influence of different surface treatments on repair bond strength. Methods: A total of 80-disc shaped specimens was fabricated using two resin based composite materials; IPS Empress Direct Enamel and OptiShade (n = 40). Substrate discs were thermocycle 5000 cycles then each substrate material was subdivided based on the surface treatment into two groups; air particle abrasion (APA) and silicon carbide grinding (SiCr) both groups followed by phosphoric acid etching. All groups received a single bond universal adhesive application prior to repairing with composite, in a smaller disc shape. All specimens were thermocycled for 10,000 cycles prior to shear bond strength testing and subsequent failure analysis. Statistical analyses were conducted and the level of statistical significance was set at 0.05. Results: The comparison of mean values (considering the combination of the two types of substrates, surface treatments and repairing materials) showed a highly statistically significant difference in the shear bond strength among the eight study groups (p < 0.0001). The highest value of mean shear bond strength was associated with OptiShade substrates repaired by Diamond ONE (38.6 ± 2.4). Meanwhile, the lowest value was recorded for the SiCr treated OptiShade group repaired by Diamond ONE (13.6 ± 2.3). The failure analysis revealed that cohesive mode of failure was the most predominant. Conclusion: Omnichroma showed higher repair bond strength values with SiCr surface treatment. Meanwhile, Charisma Diamond ONE had better bond strength with APA. Surface pretreatment had a significant impact on the repair bond strength where APA groups had significantly higher values compared to SiCr groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.