ArticleHeliyon2023
A deep learning-based framework for predicting survival-associated groups in colon cancer by integrating multi-omics and clinical data.
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Deep learning in multi-omics integration for gastrointestinal cancer biomarker discovery.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Survival-LCS: Rule-Based Survival Analysis without Proportional Hazard Assumptions.ACM transactions on evolutionary learning and optimization · 2026Article
- Machine learning-driven multi-targeted drug discovery in colon cancer using biomarker signatures.NPJ precision oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Precise prognostic classification of patients and identifying survival subgroups and their associated genes can be important clinical references when designing treatment strategies for cancer patients. Multi-omics and data integration techniques are powerful tools to achieve this goal. This study aimed to introduce a machine learning method to integrate three types of biological data, and investigate the performance of two other methods, in identifying the survival dependency of patients. The data included TCGA RNA-seq gene expression, DNA methylation, and clinical data from 368 patients with colon cancer also we use an independent external validation data set, containing 232 samples. Three methods including, hyper-parameter optimized autoencoders (HPOAE), normal autoencoder, and penalized principal component analysis (PPCA) were used for simultaneous data integration and estimation under a COX hazards model. The HPOAE was thought to outperform other methods. The HPOAE had the Log Rank Mantel-Cox value of 14.27 ± 2, and a Breslow-Generalized Wilcoxon value of 13.13 ± 1. Ten miRNA, 11 methylated genes, and 28 mRNA all by (importance of marginal cutoff > 0.95) were identified. The study demonstrated that hsa-miR-485-5p targets both ZMYM1 and tp53, the latter of which has been previously associated with cancer in numerous studies. Furthermore, compared to other methods, the HPOAE exhibited a greater capacity for identifying survival subgroups and the genes associated with them in patients with colon cancer. However, all of the results were obtained by computational methods, and clinical and experimental studies are needed to validate these results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.