Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37455913›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in endocrinology2023

Efficacy and safety of subcutaneous semaglutide in adults with overweight or obese: a subgroup meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Rui Zhang, Qin-Chuan Hou, Bing-Hong Li, Ling Deng, Yu-Mei Yang, Ting-Xin Li, Xiao-Qin Yao, Liang-Liang Yang, Xi-Long Lin, Yi-Qian Liao and 5 more

Open access · goldFull text readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. The expanding role of semaglutide: beyond glycemic control.Journal of diabetes and metabolic disorders · 2025
    Review
  6. Progress and challenges in obesity pharmacotherapy: semaglutide as a milestone.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Rui ZhangDepartment of Health Management & Physical Examination, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Qin-Chuan HouDepartment of Health Management & Physical Examination, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Bing-Hong LiDepartment of Health Management & Physical Examination, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Ling DengDepartment of Health Management & Physical Examination, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Yu-Mei YangDepartment of Health Management & Physical Examination, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Ting-Xin LiDepartment of Health Management & Physical Examination, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Xiao-Qin YaoDepartment of Health Management & Physical Examination, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Liang-Liang YangDepartment of Health Management & Physical Examination, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Xi-Long LinSchool of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Yi-Qian LiaoSchool of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Lin WangDepartment of Health Management & Physical Examination, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Yu-Ping LiuDepartment of Health Management & Physical Examination, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Jing TanChinese Evidence-based Medicine Center and National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Zheng-Wei WanDepartment of Health Management & Physical Examination, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Ping ShuaiDepartment of Health Management & Physical Examination, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
University of Electronic Science and Technology of China · CNSichuan University · CNSouthwest Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Semaglutide shows significant performance on weight reduction in several clinical trials. However, it is not clear what kind of administration frequency or dosage will achieve better effects. This study aims to explore the different therapeutic effect of semaglutide on weight control under the diverse administration circumstances. Methods: The PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and the Clinical Trials.gov were searched from inception until 6 June, 2022 to include randomized controlled trials evaluating the Efficacy and safety of subcutaneous semaglutide in overweight or obese adults. Random effects or fixed effects model was conducted based on the heterogeneity among trials. Subgroup analysis was performed to identify the detailed effects under different intervention situations. Results and discussion: Our study included 13 RCTs involving 5,838 participants with 3,794 ones in semaglutide group and 2,044 in placebo group. Semaglutide was associated with a significant reduction on weight loss related outcomes, including the absolute value of weight loss (WMD -8·97, 95% CI -10·73 to -7·21), percentage of weight loss (WMD -10·00, 95% CI -11·99 to -8·00), body mass index (WMD-3·19, 95% CI -4·02 to -2·37) and waist circumference (WMD -7·21,95% CI -8·87 to -5·56). Subgroup analyses illustrated participants with high weekly dosage, long-term treatment duration and severe baseline BMI (Class II obesity) had a more remarkably decreasing on the main outcomes of weight loss (P for interaction<0·05). Total adverse reactions occurred more frequently in the daily administration group than that in the weekly group (P for interaction =0·01). During the treatment, the incidence rate of hypoglycemia was higher in the group without lifestyle intervention compared with that with lifestyle intervention (P for interaction =0·04). Interpretation Subcutaneous semaglutide had significant benefits on weight loss with reasonable safety in overweight or obese adults. Moreover, additional benefits on cardiometabolic profiles were also seen. We recommended semaglutide treatment to be coupled with lifestyle interventions, and target dose of 2·0 mg or more subcutaneously once weekly. Clinicians can choose suitable treatment schemes based on diverse individual situations. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=337099, identifier PROSPERO (CRD42022337099).

Indexed as

ObesityOverweightAdultHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSemaglutideWeight LossSemaglutidemeta-analysisobeseoverweightsemaglutidesubgroup

Identifiers

PMID37455913
PMCPMC10338217
OpenAlexW4382584532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.