ReviewAdvances in medical education and practice2023
Peer Teaching in Undergraduate Medical Education: What are the Learning Outputs for the Student-Teachers? A Systematic Review.
Review in Advances in medical education and practice, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.
- From image to clinical judgment: a randomized near-peer teaching trial on systematic chest radiograph interpretation.BMC medical education · 2026Trial
- Exploring Medical Students' Perceptions of Near-peer Teaching in Musculoskeletal OSCE Preparation.Medical science educator · 2026Article
- Comparison of Psychometric Performance of Faculty and Student Authored Anatomy Exam Items in Medical Education.Medical science educator · 2026Article
- Cooking with the curriculum: expanding nutrition knowledge in medical education through a longitudinal, peer teaching, culinary medicine model.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Twelve tips for teaching medical communication skills in a second language.BMC medical education · 2026Review
- Evaluation of professional course teaching behavior and self-reported professional competence in medical students: the effects of professional identity evaluation and campus environment satisfaction.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence and Large Language Models: A Case-Based, Peer-Teaching Workshop for Preclinical Medical Students.MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources · 2026Article
- Article
- "Flying the Nest" - The Transition from the Pre-Clinical to Clinical Years in Medical Education: A Pilot Study Exploring Contemporary Challenges and Opportunities for Enhancement.Advances in medical education and practice · 2026Article
- Enhancing medical students' self-efficacy toward national competency standards: a student-led training model in a lower-middle-income country.BMC medical education · 2025Observational
- Development of a digital peer-feedback tool for clinical skills training: a pilot study with second-year medical students.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Learning Outputs for Peer Teachers in Undergraduate Medical Education.Medical science educator · 2025Article
- Learning to teach by teaching your peers: exploring students' needs for training in the undergraduate medical education curriculum.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Article
- AI-powered standardised patients: evaluating ChatGPT-4o's impact on clinical case management in intern physicians.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- From Tutor to Future Educator: Investigating the Role of Peer-Peer Tutoring in Shaping Careers in Medical Education.Medical science educator · 2025Article
- Effect of peer facilitation in anatomy small group curriculum on academic performance and retention: A pilot study.Anatomical sciences education · 2025Article
- Near-Peer Training: Impact of a Single Session on Students' OSCE Performance.Advances in medical education and practice · 2025Article
- Unpacking the perceptions and experiences of student facilitators in interprofessional education: a qualitative study.Medical education online · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: To achieve quality in medical education, peer teaching, understood as students taking on roles as educators for peers, is frequently used as a teaching intervention. While the benefits of peer teaching for learners and faculty are described in detail in the literature, less attention is given to the learning outputs for the student-teachers. This systematic review focuses on the learning outputs for medical undergraduates acting as student-teachers in the last decade (2012-2022). Aim: Our aim is to describe what learning outputs student-teachers have from peer teaching, and map what research methods are used to assess the outputs. We defined learning outputs in a broad sense, including all types of learning experiences, intended and non-intended, associated with being a peer teacher. Methods: A literature search was conducted in four electronic databases. Title, abstract and full text were screened by 8 independent reviewers and selection was based on predefined eligibility criteria. We excluded papers not describing structured peer teaching interventions with student-teachers in a formalized role. From the included articles we extracted information about the learning outputs of being a student-teacher as medical undergraduate. Results: From 668 potential titles, 100 were obtained as full-texts, and 45 selected after close examination, group deliberation, updated search and quality assessment using MERSQI score (average score 10/18). Most articles reported learning outputs using mixed methods (67%). Student-teachers reported an increase in subject-specific learning (62%), pedagogical knowledge and skills (49%), personal outputs (31%) and generic skills (38%). Most articles reported outputs using self-reported data (91%). Conclusion: Although there are few studies that systematically investigate student-teachers learning outputs, evidence suggests that peer teaching offers learning outputs for the student-teachers and helps them become better physicians. Further research is needed to enhance learning outputs for student-teachers and systematically investigate student-teachers' learning outputs and its impact on student-teachers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.